Hello Yves...
-Well and for this Saturday I will taste Smirnoff Vodka (English version) that surely ours anglo friends here know it.
As a frenchman are you more close to Armagnac or to Wine ? /Here we ave one of the best Malbec.
I m been thinking to return to smoke my olds good pipes fiiled with the best Latakia ...
I read that at the south of France people drink Absinthe (At Arles where Van Gogh lived).
-Well as you have 50 decks you owe to us an article here about these topic,so about the link between this ending red strape as seen on Dodal and Chosson,because this could help us to place Chosson deck related to the others.
So you have too much work for this weekend mon bon ami... (I know you can do it by far ).
I said that also both have XII as IIX as also Jean Pierre Payen (from which a I have black and white version)
Again I ask to you if you know a site that have Dodal high quality images.
-About LE PANCES I knew Aeclectic thread and also Monsieur Flornoy argument.
So she is pregnant.From whom ? // L EMPEREVR ?.LE PAPE ?,LE BATELEVR,LE MAT ?
I think the "father" is LE MAT,and she is pregnant of wisdom.See how he go away form the sequence cards...
He hasn t any number so any place,but he has a name so he exists.
One number something or someone related to others ,so to place him ( "All in this universe has number,weight and measure" ).
-Steve: Your post is spining in my head till now,and I think has too much firewod to sustain the topic thread...
Do you think that could be also a connection with the 22 chapters of the Apocalypse of St. John ?
-JMD:Thank s for your honesty...
I think that the reversal topic as we discussed many times isn t a minor subject.
I mean if you accept that IIX is an 8 so not a XII,that has a tremendous consequence because (and keep in mind us as card players ) our good friend LE PENDV must placed as Vieville did.
This as you know changes absolutely the card meaning itself and of course related with the others...
Thus this card isn t reversed is upward and Vieville,Chosson,Dodal,Jean Pierre Payen and others that Yves surely give notice of his 50 decks,weren t negligents...
I insist here that we all have an extraordinary opportunity to investigate a deck without any help than the cards themselves.
So that force us to return to the good and old exercise of just see the cards.As new born childs,as we seen the first candy pouch that now we can surely remember exactly as it was,because we saw it so not thought it,because we were ONE WITH IT...
-I told to you that I m working that I hope finish this weekend so to post here.
The main start point are the cards themselves.All with the intention to attempt to place Chosson deck.
All is around two cards for me strongly related each other: LE MAT and XIII (Both going to the same side)
THE FIRST NAMED AND UNNUMBERED,THE SECOND NUMBERED SO NOT NAMED.
Named: Someone that exists but not necesary is present so here or there or elsewhere.
Numbered: Someone who has a place designated related to others
LE MAT: Exists out of the card sequence,reinforced because is the unique card that the figure is undoubtedly moving "out" from the sequence.
XIII: Has a place related to the others,so a purpose so clear and an own meaning not overlapped to the rest of the cards,but related to them.(Death isn t named because she isn t exist really,because Spirit never die,just only the body)
-That reminds me the minors.So we have the honours named and unnumbered and the numerals numbered and unnamed.
-Also we have the aces and the deniers which both are unnumbered and unnamed.
Could it means my good friend that following my thesis above mentioned that the 56 minors or pips preceded the 22 majors ?
I mean aces and deniers are unnamed and unnumbered,so should preceded this physical world,so could depict an archetypical world ...
Pips has clearly a 4 structure based as majors so we have IIII and not IIIII,because we have a V.
Majors structure row sequence: I to V /VI to X / XI to XV / XVI to XX -- XXI end of the sequence,the new Jerusalem // LE MAT = God.
-I saw the COUPEE example and you re right..
As we know these cards show the topic : From V to VIIII
BATON and EPEE: the two V lie down as a future X to become. ( > and the contrary side placed )
COUPE : Two V also lie down but as to become a rhombus (Another Mandorla here ? / A Vagina also depiction ? /So a female relation with COUPE ? / Don t you think that the two of COUPE depict an Opium poppy,so a relation with the Land of Dreams ? (
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... eh-102.jpg )
-So we have DENIERS unnumbered and unamed,and COUPE with an unique V rhombus pattern and BATON and EPEE with an becoming X.
Thus DENIERS as outside the sequence,COUPE alone ad EPEE and BATON closely related.
-Finally,again I would like to point that the cards are enough clear themselves to show us these topics.
LE MAT unnumbered also show to us that the name of the cards must place below,and that the card has a place for a number that doesn t exists.
Also as the unique card only named show that we must read the sequence from left to the right,so that why I pointed that he is going out of the sequence.
Contrary XIII card show to us that the number of the card must place at the top of the card but also that contrary LE MAT its hasn t a place or space for name it (For me just because doesn t exists ).
My best wishes and good weekend for all...
Eugim