Banner

Tarot History Forum

Tarot History Forum - 600 years of history in 78 cards

VANDENBORRE BACCHUS TAROT

1
Hello everybody,
I recently acquired a Vandenborre Bacchus Tarot deck. It's slightly different from the Marsigliese one, with elements from the Vieville and the bolognese decks, misspellings, and Capitan Fracassa and Bacchus replacing the High Priestess and the Hierophant.
I was wondering if anybody knew something about this deck and its divinatory meanings, since I read that it does follow more vernacular meanings in cartomancy (more like the Tarocchino Bolognese), and also it would be wonderful if somebody had the booklet included in the package (which I'm missing) and was willing to send me pictures of that.
Thanks in advance!

(including some *not mine* pictures of the deck in question)
Attachments
4838124867.jpg 4838124867.jpg Viewed 459 times 63.78 KiB
4838126313.jpg 4838126313.jpg Viewed 459 times 82.05 KiB
4640327682.jpg 4640327682.jpg Viewed 459 times 152.62 KiB
4640327687.jpg 4640327687.jpg Viewed 459 times 154.8 KiB
4640327978.jpg 4640327978.jpg Viewed 459 times 118.55 KiB
4640327697.jpg 4640327697.jpg Viewed 459 times 163.2 KiB
4640327707.jpg 4640327707.jpg Viewed 459 times 158.8 KiB
4640327990.jpg 4640327990.jpg Viewed 459 times 154.04 KiB
4640330814.jpg 4640330814.jpg Viewed 459 times 174.74 KiB

Re: VANDENBORRE BACCHUS TAROT

4
firecatpickles wrote: 16 Sep 2025, 15:55 If this is the version you have, you are in luck with the quality of cardstock! It is amazing!
This is the one I have as well. It is a pleasure to handle.

Re: VANDENBORRE BACCHUS TAROT

5
What I found of interest in the booklet was that the narratives for Batons and Swords went from the Ace to the 10, while for Cups and Coins it went from Ten to Ace. That of course corresponds to the order in the game (as the booklet says, in the latter, the value decreases as the number increases.) I have not paid much attention to Little White Books. Is this typical or rather unique? How far back do you think it goes? My guess is that it would go back at least to when the game with that order was popular, so the 19th or perhaps 18th century. Any comments?

Re: VANDENBORRE BACCHUS TAROT

6
Thanks for posting the booklet Ross. I was given this deck some years ago, without the booklet.

Curiously, I note the reference to the 1770 review of Etteilla's work in l'Avant-Coureur, a journal of the time, which I've translated as part of a (forthcoming) series on Etteilla, his contemporaries and followers. Aside from one recent academic paper, I don't recall seeing any other mention of those reviews.