Banner

Tarot History Forum

Tarot History Forum - 600 years of history in 78 cards

Re: Bolognese sequence

391
Magic Moon wrote: 26 May 2025, 18:45 Huck, where do you think that Sola Busca was created? Where do you think was in these moment the Lucca Tarot sequence that you see in Sola Busca?
That's a complex question., cause one should observe a lot of things. The origin I see in Rome in connection to the Roman Accademy, which took some influence of a game, which developed very early in Lucca (I think of the year 1369, cause emperor Karl IV was in this year in Lucca) . Johannes of Rheinfelden knew a game with 5 suits in 1377/78, probably a deck with 5x13 cards. It wouldn't be a wonder, if Karl IV also knew such a deck and the additional idea, that one of the suits had the trumps-function is not very difficult. It's not necessary to assume, that the Lucca-1369 deck already had complicared motifs similar to the later Trionfi versions.

The actual realization of the Sola-Busca knows the year number 1491 cause of the sentence, that uses a year after the foundation of the city Venice. Before 1491 there was at least one member of the Roman Accademia in Ferrara. Alfonso d'Este, son of Ercole d'Este, married in early 1491 and in the same year, short after the wedding Alfonso made a journey to Venice..

I remember, that I once saw, that Alfonso travelled to Venice very short after the wedding in spring 1491.
https://oro.open.ac.uk/57524/3/57524.pdf .... has that Alfonso travelled to Venice with his wife and his mother in May 1493.
https://www.google.de/books/edition/Hum ... frontcover
.... has "When the princesses of the house of Este arrived in Venice in 1491, a classical pantomine on the legend of Meleager was performed in the ducal palace as boat races took place on the Grand Canal."

The report to 1493 has much more content and doesn't notice Meleager or boat races, so likely Alfonso was twice in Venice. From this I conclude, that probably the Sola-Busca was made as a wedding deck and brougth to Venice as a present. The Sola-Busca still exists in 3 versions, that was a mass production.

The wedding was a double wedding. Alfonso d'Este married Anna Sforza and Ludovico Sforza married Beatrice d'Este. 12 of January or 12 of February 1491.
Milan married Ferrara. Unlucky marriages, the brides died young (both in 1497).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfonso_I_d%27Este .... heir of Ferrara
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna_Sforza .... daughter of Galeazzo Maria Sforza, once duke of Milan
--------
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludovico_Sforza .... brother of duke Galeazzo Maria Sforza, momentary ruler and later duke of Milan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beatrice_d%27Este .... sister of Alfonso

There was a war Ferrara-Venice with the participation of others .... Milan had helped Ferrara
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_Fe ... 1482–1484)

There were not much notes with Trionfi at Venetian territory before 1482. After 1484 the Trionfi documents with allowances expanded ....
http://trionfi.com/0/e/39/ ..... Brescia (1488), Salo (1489) and Bergamo (1491)
Last edited by Huck on 29 May 2025, 10:57, edited 1 time in total.

Re: Bolognese sequence

392
Huck wrote,
The origin I see in Rome in connection to the Roman Accademy, which took some influence of a game, which developed very early in Lucca (I think of the year 1369, cause emperor Karl IV was in this year in Lucca) .
How was the Roman Academy involved? What is your source?

Joannes says that the game of cards was introduced very recently. 1369 is not very close to 1377. And Johannes' fifth suit is no different from the other four, i.e. with number cards, King, Ober, Unter. Very unlike the SB.

For Alfonso being a member of the Roman Academy, you need a source, too. I don't see it in Wikipedia. Also, is that the same Roman Academy as in 1369? What makes you think that their members kept up the tradition of whatever game it was in 1369?

I would not trust that 1491 reference to the "princesses" (and Alfonso) visiting Venice. It sounds too much like the 1493 visit with a wrong year. In any case, the connection to Venice is very tenuous: a Milanese-Ferrara double wedding in Ferrara is followed by a visit to Venice. That does not seem to me enough to warrant commissioning a deck referencing Venice in connection with that wedding.

When you say "a present," do you mean a gift from someone in Venice? Who? Someone who also belonged to the Roman Academy? If from Alfonso to someone else, what does he have to do with Venice? A mere visit isn't enough. There are also the "M.S." initials in the deck. Surely that would be someone in the wedding.

Re: Bolognese sequence

393
If we wanted to imagine a conciliatory conception between Mikeh and Huck in this matter, perhaps we could think something like this. Nowadays, it's common for newlyweds to take a tourist trip to some place immediately after the wedding. This trip is called a "honeymoon" (at least in Spanish). I suppose that in the 15th century, it wasn't common to take a married trip to Venice, but I don't know. In any case, I don't see a problem with traveling to Venice in 1491 or 1493, or twice, or more than twice. If the trip took place in 1491, then the wedding was recent. If the trip only took place in 1493, then it wasn't a wedding trip, but they could have taken decks to give to friends in Venice. That could be a good opportunity to color some copies and give them away. Francesco Sforza built a castle in Venice in 1458, if I remember correctly. Perhaps the Dukes of Milan still had properties in Venice in 1491. That makes it easier for Alfonso d'Este to go to Venice with his wife. Sorry if I was vague. I don't know if Huck's proposal is true, but I think I can imagine something similar without much trouble, after observing Mikeh's interesting observations.

I wasn't familiar with that Roman academy, but I'm reading on Wiki, and it seems it was reestablished in 1471 after being interrupted by an anti-humanist Pope. It was a Renaissance academy where they worshipped ancient Roman culture, which could be related to the heroes of the Sola-Busca deck.

Huck, you say someone from the Roman Academy was in Ferrara before 1491. Was that person Alfonso d'Este or was it someone else?

Thanks

PD. Huck, are we sure that Johanes text is dated 1377 or probably it is wrote later?

Re: Bolognese sequence

394
mikeh wrote: 27 May 2025, 12:31
How was the Roman Academy involved? What is your source?
Most of the 22 trump figures look like Romans. Nabucadnezar not. Mato not, Falco not. Perhaps also a few others not.
Joannes says that the game of cards was introduced very recently. 1369 is not very close to 1377. And Johannes' fifth suit is no different from the other four, i.e. with number cards, King, Ober, Unter. Very unlike the SB
.
1369 is closer to 1377 as the year 1300.
We don't know, how the 5th suit did looked and we don't know how the other 4 looked. Johannes made a short one-sentence statement.
Yes, the SB is a complete deck and the Johannes-5-suit-deck is a sentence.
For Alfonso being a member of the Roman Academy, you need a source, too. I don't see it in Wikipedia. Also, is that the same Roman Academy as in 1369? What makes you think that their members kept up the tradition of whatever game it was in 1369?

I didn't say, that Alfonso was a member of the Roman accademia. I said, that at least one member was in Ferrara in the 1490s. I don't remember the name in the moment. As I said, it is curious, that Wikipedia has only 3 articles to this term "Accademia Romana" and this are a Russian, a German and a Spanish.
I would not trust that 1491 reference to the "princesses" (and Alfonso) visiting Venice. It sounds too much like the 1493 visit with a wrong year. In any case, the connection to Venice is very tenuous: a Milanese-Ferrara double wedding in Ferrara is followed by a visit to Venice. That does not seem to me enough to warrant commissioning a deck referencing Venice in connection with that wedding.
I also remember another statement with "1491" relative short after the wedding. I don't remember, where this info came from, I don't claim, that I'm perfect..
When you say "a present," do you mean a gift from someone in Venice? Who? Someone who also belonged to the Roman Academy? If from Alfonso to someone else, what does he have to do with Venice? A mere visit isn't enough. There are also the "M.S." initials in the deck. Surely that would be someone in the wedding.
The present is perhaps the fact with the "year ...x... after the foundation of the city Venice" (or similar) as an inscription on a playing card.
Bild_2025-05-28_002423493.png Bild_2025-05-28_002423493.png Viewed 4799 times 167.38 KiB
Ercole d'Este - Savonarola ?????
Alfonso d'Este - Savonarola ?????
Bild_2025-05-28_003041139.png Bild_2025-05-28_003041139.png Viewed 4797 times 324.29 KiB
older Alfonso d'Este ... is that a flat nose?

Alfonso d'Este had in the year 1491 the proud age of 15 years. Perhaps the painter found it a good idea to let him look more powerful than in reality.
Last edited by Huck on 28 May 2025, 08:13, edited 1 time in total.

Re: Bolognese sequence

395
Huck: Thanks for the clarifications, such as you can. English Wikipedia's article is at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_academies. It links to a long article on the Roman Academy by Susanna de Beer. The Roman Academy was so-called because it was based in Rome, not because of its interest in Roman history. Its members seem, from what de Beer says, mostly interested in Roman-era Latin poetry. But maybe that's de Beer's interest.

I see from old posts that Lazzarelli was connected with the Roman Academy. He is vaguely connected with Ferrara, probably the person you were thinking of. He debated a Jewish Kabbalist at Ercole's request, as I recall. He is Gnaccolini's candidate for the designer of the deck. He was nowhere near Ferrara or Venice at this time, but that doesn't mean he couldn't have been a link. He was from the Marches, which is where Gnaccolini thinks the deck was engraved. (Magic Moon: Gnaccolini authored a long essay on the SB for the Brera Gallery in 2012. See Marco Ponzi at viewtopic.php?p=13406#p13406 for a summary.) I don't think he would have known enough about Roman history himself - alchemy was more his line.

Experts on Roman history were, of course, not confined to that academy. I think particularly of Poliziano, who lectured in Venice in the early 1480s (see Phaeded at viewtopic.php?p=16025&hilit=poliziano#p16025) and would have maintained connections there.

The 2 of Coins may well refer to Ercole and his physician Michele Savonarola, father of the preacher. Well, lots of people had good relations with Ercole and Michele, including some in Venice (e.g. the Sanudos, Marino being a possible M. S.).

Reading old posts, I see that you talk about a visit to Venice by Alfonso and his father to Venice in the spring of 1491. I'm still not sure about your source. viewtopic.php?p=16016&hilit=father#p16016.

If it was an Este wedding, you'd expect some coats of arms of the bride and groom. But the only recognizable heraldry is Venier, although Gnaccolini finds the possibility of Sanudo as well (Marino's mother's and father's families).

Magic Moon: if you want to read up on our old discussions of the SB, you can find them using the Search function on the Forum. The term "Gnaccolini" will get you toward the more informed ones.

Re: Bolognese sequence

396
MikeH wrote ...
If it was an Este wedding, you'd expect some coats of arms of the bride and groom. But the only recognizable heraldry is Venier, although Gnaccolini finds the possibility of Sanudo as well (Marino's mother's and father's families).
At which card of the Sola Busca is Venier heraldry ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcus_An ... Sabellicus
Sabellicus was responsible for the sentence about the Este ladies in Venice in 1491 (Meleager show and boat racing).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beatrice_d%27Este
Beatrice d'Este and her perspective of the show and lady visit in 1493. Beatrice had a diplomatic mission.,

Re: Bolognese sequence

397
Baccho (XIV) and Ace of Swords for sure, probably the Ace of Batons. To be clear: I am talking about the painted cards, the ones with the year from the founding of Venice painted on. Sanudo is hypothesized for the Aces of Cups and Coins. Search "Venier" on this Forum for the documentation.

Do you have a source for Sabellicus as the source for the 1491 account? I see that he was a member of the Roman Academy, too.

One other question: I still don't understand how you link that Roman Academy, which didn't exist until around 1450, with Charles IV and Lucca.

Re: Bolognese sequence

398
mikeh wrote: 28 May 2025, 22:54 Baccho (XIV) and Ace of Swords for sure, probably the Ace of Batons. To be clear: I am talking about the painted cards, the ones with the year from the founding of Venice painted on. Sanudo is hypothesized for the Aces of Cups and Coins. Search "Venier" on this Forum for the documentation.
Bild_2025-05-30_043133458.png Bild_2025-05-30_043133458.png Viewed 4728 times 2.56 MiB
from .... https://www.finestresullarte.info/de/we ... k-der-welt

Well, that's okay.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marino_Sanuto_the_Younger
Sabellicus is also mentioned in the article.

There is an "M" on the shield of Bocho, somewhere else an "MS" for Marino Sanuto.
Bild_2025-05-30_045547999.png Bild_2025-05-30_045547999.png Viewed 4725 times 812.07 KiB
This comes up for "Venier, heraldry"
Bild_2025-05-30_044740847.png Bild_2025-05-30_044740847.png Viewed 4726 times 677.5 KiB
******************

MikeH ....
Do you have a source for Sabellicus as the source for the 1491 account? I see that he was a member of the Roman Academy, too.
"M. Ant. Sabellici Epist. L. III. fol. 17" is given as the Sabellicus address in one of the Burkhardt texts (the work is variously presented, not all have the footnote).

******************

There was a war, Venice and Rome were united against Ferrara 1482-84.
30 November 1406 to 4 July 1415 Gregory XII Gregorius Duodecimus Angelo Correr Venice, Italy
4 July 1415 to 11 November 1417 Sede vacante (interregnum)
11 November 1417 to 20 February 1431 Martin V Martinus Quintus Oddone Colonna Rome, Italy
3 March 1431 to 23 February 1447 Eugene IV, O.S.A. Eugenius Quartus Gabriele Condulmer Venice, Italy
6 March 1447 to 24 March 1455 Nicholas V, O.P. Nicolaus Quintus Tommaso Parentucelli Sarzana, Liguria, Italy
8 April 1455 to 6 August 1458 Callixtus III Callistus Tertius Alfonso de Borgia Xàtiva, València, Spain
19 August 1458 to 15 August 1464 Pius II Pius Secundus Enea Silvio Piccolomini Siena, Italy
30 August 1464 to 26 July 1471 Paul II Paulus Secundus Pietro Barbo Venice, Italy
9 August 1471 to 12 August 1484 Sixtus IV, O.F.M. Xystus Quartus Francesco della Rovere Savona, Italy
From 78 years between 1406-1484 were 9+16+7 = 32 dominated by popes from Venice (Gregory XII, Eugene IV, Paul II) and the last pope in the row, Sixtus IV, used Venice to fight with Ferrara and he reigned another 13 years. 6 days after his death (1st of August) peace was declared (7th of August).

The list of the popes .... https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_popes .... with 249 names knows 4 with the attribut "born in Venice". The 4th was Clement XIII (6 July 1758 to 2 February 1769) . So we have a rather unusual close Rome-Venice connection in 15th century, likely caused by the fears in Konstantinople and after 1453 the fear of further attacks of the Osmans.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottoman_c ... of_Otranto

******************
MikeH ....
One other question: I still don't understand how you link that Roman Academy, which didn't exist until around 1450, with Charles IV and Lucca.
The year 1369 was a big luck for Lucca. This year caused , that Lucca could solve a crisis which started with the death of Castruccio in 1328.

Wikipedia Italian
Alla morte di Castruccio la città cade in un periodo di anarchia che la vede soggiacere al dominio dei Visconti e successivamente al governo di Giovanni dell'Agnello, doge della Repubblica di Pisa. Riottenuta la libertà nel 1370 per intervento dell'imperatore Carlo IV[13], Lucca si dette un governo repubblicano e con un'accorta politica estera tornò a conoscere una notevole fama in Europa grazie ai suoi banchieri e al commercio della seta. L'imperatore Carlo IV concesse alla città anche la possibilità di dotarsi di uno studium generale, ma una vera e propria università lucchese non entrerà in funzione prima del 1787.
translated
After Castruccio's death, the city fell into a period of anarchy which saw it succumb to the dominion of the Visconti and subsequently to the government of Giovanni dell'Agnello, doge of the Republic of Pisa. Having regained its freedom in 1370 through the intervention of the emperor Charles IV[13], Lucca gave itself a republican government and with a shrewd foreign policy it regained considerable fame in Europe thanks to its bankers and the silk trade. The emperor Charles IV also granted the city the possibility of equipping itself with a studium generale, but a real university of Lucca did not come into operation before 1787.
Wikipedia English
In 1314, internal discord allowed Uguccione della Faggiuola of Pisa to make himself lord of Lucca. The Lucchesi expelled him two years later, and handed over the city to another condottiero, Castruccio Castracani, under whose rule it became a leading state in central Italy. Lucca rivalled Florence until Castracani's death in 1328. On 22 and 23 September 1325, in the battle of Altopascio, Castracani defeated Florence's Guelphs. For this he was nominated by Louis IV the Bavarian to become duke of Lucca. Castracani's tomb is in the church of San Francesco. His biography is Machiavelli's third famous book on political rule.
Occupied by the troops of Louis of Bavaria, the city was sold to a rich Genoese, Gherardino Spinola, then seized by John, king of Bohemia. Pawned to the Rossi of Parma, by them it was ceded to Mastino II della Scala of Verona, sold to the Florentines, surrendered to the Pisans, and then nominally liberated by the emperor Charles IV and governed by his vicar.
..... Lucca managed, at first as a democracy, and after 1628 as an oligarchy, to maintain its independence alongside of Venice and Genoa, and painted the word Libertas on its banner until the French Revolution in 1789.
Wikipedia German
Doch bereits im Jahr darauf verstießen die Luccheser den durch seinen Sieg zu einflussreich gewordenen Uguccione della Faggiola und übergaben die Stadt an Castruccio Castracani, unter dessen geschickter Tyrannei sie für kurze Zeit bis zu seinem Tod 1328 – sein Grab befindet sich in der Kirche San Francesco – die führende Stadt Italiens wurde.
Von den Truppen Ludwigs des Bayern besetzt, an den reichen Genueser Gheradino Spinola verkauft, vom böhmischen König Johann besetzt, an die Rossi aus Parma verpfändet, von denen an Mastino della Scala aus Verona abgetreten, an die Florentiner verkauft, an die Pisaner übergeben, nominell befreit von Kaiser Karl IV. und von seinen Vikaren, Marquard von Randeck und seinem Neffen Walther von Hochschlitz, regiert,[4] gelang es Lucca, ab 1369 zuerst als Demokratie, nach 1628 als patrizisch-aristokratische Oligarchie, seine Unabhängigkeit als Stadtrepublik neben Venedig und Genua zu behaupten. Bis zur Französischen Revolution schrieb es das Wort Libertas auf seine Fahnen.
translated
But just the following year, the Lucchese expelled Uguccione della Faggiola, who had become too influential thanks to his victory, and handed the city over to Castruccio Castracani, under whose skillful tyranny it became the leading city in Italy for a short time until his death in 1328 – his tomb is in the Church of San Francesco.
Occupied by the troops of Louis the Bavarian, sold to the rich Genoese Gheradino Spinola, occupied by the Bohemian King John, pawned to the Rossi of Parma, ceded by them to Mastino della Scala of Verona, sold to the Florentines, handed over to the Pisans, nominally liberated by Emperor Charles IV and ruled by his vicars, Marquard von Randeck and his nephew Walther von Hochschlitz,[4] Lucca managed to assert its independence as a city-republic alongside Venice and Genoa, from 1369 onwards, first as a democracy and after 1628 as a patrician-aristocratic oligarchy. Until the French Revolution, it inscribed the word Libertas on its banners.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marquard_I._von_Randeck

*********************

In the month of September 1368 Karl IV was iin Lucca. Then he travelled towards Rome to reach the aim of the journey, which was to install the pope Urban V. again in Italy instead of Avignon. His forth wife was crowned as an empress, but the real aim was not realized.

About the pope ....
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urban_V.
partial translation
He strove to reunite the papacy in Italy and suppress his rivals, who had grown powerful there. In 1363, he excommunicated Bernabò Visconti and ordered a crusade against him and his relatives throughout Italy. He called them "robbers of ecclesiastical property." The following year, however, he deemed it necessary to lift the ban to restore peace. The occupied lands returned to Urban, who paid Visconti 500,000 florins for them.[1]

In 1364, Emperor Charles IV, the poet Giovanni Boccaccio as envoy of the city of Florence, Saint Bridget of Sweden, and Petrarch arrived in Avignon. They urged Pope Urban to return to Rome. But it was not until October 16, 1367 [mistake, it was 1368], that he entered Rome, accompanied by the German Emperor. Urban was greeted by Cardinal Albornoz, who had completed his fourteen years of work as a pacifier and legislator of the Papal States. Shortly thereafter, the cardinal died. In Rome, the Pope crowned Emperor Charles's wife, Elizabeth of Pomerania, as Empress.

On October 21, 1369, the Vatican received the Byzantine Emperor John V. John V wanted to convert to Catholicism and thus end the Eastern Schism. The Byzantine emperor hoped to obtain military aid for his state, which was surrounded by Islam. No member of the Byzantine clergy joined him. Pope Urban believed he had created a "union" of the churches. But this was a misconception. For the unhappy Byzantine emperor, the trip was a failure. He received no military aid and spent weeks in a Venetian debtors' prison. Finally, the emperor had to perform military service in the entourage of Sultan Murad I.

The founding of the University of Vienna was confirmed by Pope Urban. He also began to rebuild the destroyed Rome.

Death
Unable to resist the French cardinals' insistence any longer, Urban V embarked again from Corneto on September 5, 1370, bound for Avignon. Neither the threats of Saint Bridget of Sweden nor the representations of Petrarch deterred him from his plan. He arrived in Avignon on September 24 and died there shortly after on December 19.
Karl IV made 3 long journeys for this aim, the third to Paris a few years later. He died in the same year, when the first Italian was voted as Pope after the end of the Avignon adventure.
Last edited by Huck on 30 May 2025, 14:01, edited 1 time in total.

Re: Bolognese sequence

399
Huck wrote,
"M. Ant. Sabellici Epist. L. III. fol. 17" is given as the Sabellicus address in one of the Burkhardt texts (the work is variously presented, not all have the footnote).
What Burkhardt text? Even better would be a page reference.

Also, in reply to my question about what Lucca has to do with the Roman Academy, you cite Emperor Charles IV. But what does Charles IV have to do with a Roman Academy begun around 1457 by a man who wasn't born until 1428? (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_Pomponius_Laetus). Moreover, Charles had no relationship to Rome. He was only there once, for a few hours, to get crowned. The papacy he supported wasn't even in Rome. He was crowned by a cardinal.

Re: Bolognese sequence

400
You must first understand, what meaning the year 1369 had in its time. For Lucca the year had a great meaning.

The Lucca Tarocchi had 13 trionfi cards and totally 69 cards
The Sola Busca has 22 trionfi cards and totally 78 cards. The artist had split the 22 trionfi.cards in 2 groups, one with 9 and the other with 13 cards. If one takes the group of 9 cards out of the game, one gets a game with the structure of the Lucca Tarocchi.

13 Trionfi, totally 69 cards