OnePotato wrote:That would be a foliot verge escapement.
It is a part of an early clock.

OnePotato wrote:That would be a foliot verge escapement.
It is a part of an early clock.

OnePotato wrote:Sort of.
That would be a foliot verge escapement.
It is a part of an early clock.
You can see a modern repro of one here:
http://www.uh.edu/engines/foliotverge.jpg
And here is a nice drawing of the mechanism, along with some background:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verge_and_foliot




OnePotato wrote:If you google "lantern clock" you'll discover something hollow about the popularly held theory of a copyist's "error" that resulted in the shift from an hourglass to a lantern in the Hermit.
It's not an "error" if there's nothing "wrong" about it.
History repeats
The old conceits.
![]()
Have a nice day.
"If Time can be just an old man with a lantern, with but one allegorical component like a foliot escapement, then all it takes is to get rid of the weird allegorical part and what you have left is an old man with a lantern."
debra wrote:It's all allegory. A lantern-clock may be made for hanging on a wall, but an hourglass isn't made to be carried around, either. The hourglass symbolizes time, with or without the old man holding it. So much the better when combined with an old man who also symbolizes time (Saturn, maybe, or a monk who must watch the time for the sake of daily prayers). It's all artistic license for the sake of conveying the meaning.
OnePotato doesn't say that this particular wall image shows a man carrying a lantern-clock. If I take his point correctly, it's a witty depiction of the man AS a clock.

Return to The Researcher's Study
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests