A Palermo Empress for the "Alessandro Sforza"?

#1
Nobody has written yet about the cover article in The Playing Card for April-June 2016, "New Insights into the So-called Alessandro Sforza Deck", by Emilia Maggio. This is her second article on that deck, the first being one a couple of years ago on the Stag Rider. Both, and also the article on the Rothschild cards by her countrywoman Christina Fiorini in 2006, fit well into my own hypotheses about the evolution of the tarot, which I will address at some point. However Maggio's arguments are not very good, as I will explain. First I want to summarize what they are.

1. Magio's identification of the figure, its deck, and its earliest possible date.

Her point of departure is an Empress card in a collection of Italian cards, 15th-19th century, at the Palazzo Abatellus, Palermo. After Magio noticed it, attendees at the 2015 Italian ICPS convention in Palermo had a chance to look at it, too. It and a Two of Bastoni had their inner layers of paper separated from the outer painted layer. The inner layers were recycled notarial acts on which the dates 1427 and 1428 could clearly be read.

Image

She adds that stylistically the two cards are very similar to the Castello Ursino cards in Catania: she compares the Palermo Empress to the lady on the Catania "Fame" card, as she calls it (below left, with the Charles VI version next to it): their faces are very similar.
Image


Besides the Empress, there was also a Two of Bastoni in Palermo that looks like it is from the same deck, as can be seen by comparing it with the Catania Six of Bastoni. As it happens, the Catania group is missing those cards. As further confirmation, she says that the Stag Rider, of the Catania group, also shows traces of writing and the date 1428, as "accidentally discovered by the staff at Castello Ursino in 2014".

Image


That the card is of an Empress is clear from the attributes of the fleur de lys and the globe, Emperor-attributes in art of the time. She gives several examples, one from 1375 Catalonia and the other from c. 1430 (in the text, "first half of the 15th century") Piedmont (below; the fleur de lys decorates Charlemagne's robe, second from the right):

Image




Charlemagne, the first Holy Roman Empire, was traditionally associated with that symbol (as was, to be sure the Kingdom of France). Magio says that the Palermo Empress and the Charles VI Emperor both have tripartite globes, exaggerating the extent of their rule to "the boundaries of the known world". (I do not doubt that interpretation, but I do not see that division into three on the cards. I don't think it matters.)

The same attributes are also on the Rothschild and Charles VI cards, both of which also have two small figures at the bottom of the card, male instead of female. In the Rothschild, she points out, the poses of the figure are quite complementary to those on the Palermo Empress.

Image


In the Palermo and Rothschild, they represent the clemency of the Emperor. In the Charles VI, they are two vassals of the Emperor, perhaps related to the four kings in the deck, of which Alessandro Sforza, or someone else entitled to display the "diamond ring" emblem, may be one (vassal, that is).

2. Magio's dating of the deck and of the Charles VI

First, we have to see the similarity between the Catania and the Charles VI, at least in some cards. For Magio, that is grounds for considering them done around the same time. Another pair, besides the Fame card, is that of Time, or the Old Man:

Image


The Charles VI Emperor, Magio argues, is likely modeled on Sigismund, who became emperor in 1433, then in his 60s. The Charles VI Emperor's "crooked nose, white beard, and short eyebrows" are similar to Sigismund's (I don't see a crooked nose, just similar ones). If so, the famous Pisanello portrait (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigismund ... an_Emperor) makes him look younger than he was. She points out that the Cary-Yale and Brera-Brambilla are more closely related to that portrait, in that the hat is similar and the face more similar; also,the attendant holding the crown might symbolize Filippo Maria Visconti himself, who was the custodian of the Iron Crown of Italy, and in whose city Sigismund in fact was crowned with that crown and title.So the idea that another deck might do the same is not unthinkable. Also, there is a portrait in an illumination of a document from the Council of Constance, where Sigismund played a major role, that is more similar to the Charles VI Emperor.

Image


The Palermo Empress, then, would be Barbara of Cilli, Sigismund's wife. She did not accompany her husband to Italy, so there would be less resemblance to her actual features. However that same document from Constance is an approximation of what we see on the card, mainly in the hair, while the crown is a simplification of hers. (Oddly, I see two women with elaborate crowns in the illumination, one accompanied by a young commoner. Is she perhaps the ghost of Pope Joan?! But perhaps the illuminator simply wanted to portray her twice.)

Image


Magio also points to the resemblance of the Charles VI Pope's face to Eugenius IV, pope from 1431 to 1447.



Magio thinks that it is most likely that the "Charles VI" was painted in the lifetimes of both Sigismund and Eugenius, specifically to commemorate the crowning of Sigismund:
These elements point to a hypothesis of the Catania and Paris packs being devised in the mid-1430s to celebrate Sigismund's visit to Italy. Early tarot sets were produced for special occasions, such as weddings or career advancement:a state visit such as that of the emperor would inevitably be marked by, and remembered with, the creation of luxury items made to impress and sometimes used as gifts.
In consequence, Magio downplays the idea that the deck was produced for Alessandro Sforza. He, or one of the Estense, may be simply one of several personages on the cards, cast in the role of Charlemagne's palladins and other associates in relation to the Emperor himself, in a chivalric metaphor.

3, Critique of Magio: The dates on the paper.

That the Polermo Empress has the date 1427 and 1428, and Catania Stag Rider 1428, written on Notrial Acsts whose paper forms the inner layer of the cards is not that interesting in itself. The real question is, how near to those years are the cards likely to be? I know that late 15th century watermarks in the case of the Sermones de Ludos led Decker to propose "around 1500" for the Sermones. This, like the Notorial Act, is on a handwritten manuscript, not machine-printed material. I cannot think of other cases where datings have been made for manuscripts based on watermarks or other roughly datable marks on the paper.

What is fresh my mind is something on printed material. Franco Pratesi recently wrote about the Third Rosenwald Sheet, or more precisely, the Leinfelden copy of that sheet. It had stored with it four sheets of "legal opinions" from a book that was printed in many copies and editions. The museum told Franco, by email, "The Tarot sheet has been found within these printed sheets", to which Franco adds, "Sono due fogli di carta stampata di un volume di pareri giuridici in folio", they are two sheets of printed pages from a volume of bound legal opinions". In fact they are two copies of the same two pages, so that it is sure that they are not pages cut out of a book, but either rejected copies of pages, due to some error, or pages left over for some reason. By finding the right edition, that of 1501, he was able to say something about when the cards were probably made: (viewtopic.php?f=11&t=1105):
Appare improbabile che queste carte siano rimaste a lungo a disposizione dopo la stampa. L’editoria si basava su un numero limitato di copie e i fogli di carta non utilizzati erano subito richiesti per le più varie applicazioni, anche come carta per involgere merce varia. Insomma, aver trovato il 1501 come data di origine in pratica corrisponde all’incirca anche alla data di utilizzazione. Lo stesso vale per la località; non è pensabile che questi fogli scartati da una tipografia abbiano viaggiato a distanza prima di essere utilizzati; ciò sarebbe stato possibile per le pagine di un libro finito, ma non per residui di lavorazione; quindi i fogli furono incollati al terzo foglio Rosenwald vicino al tempo e [14] al luogo di produzione, Perugia 1501. In base a quanto abbiamo saputo sulla sorte di questa edizione, possiamo anche supporre che questi avanzi di lavorazione fossero stati tenuti in serbo per la produzione di ulteriori copie del libro che per le questioni legali insorte non vennero poi ultimate; in tal caso, la datazione relativa si potrebbe estendere fino al 1515; quello che è certo è che la data non poteva precedere il 1501 se non eventualmente di pochi mesi, necessari per il completamento dell’impaginazione del libro.

(It seems unlikely that these pages remained available for long after printing. The publishing business was based on a limited number of copies and the unused sheets of paper were immediately required for the most varied applications, even as paper to wrap up cargo. In short, having found 1501 as a practical date for the source, it also corresponds roughly to the date of utilization. The same applies for the town; it is unthinkable that these sheets discarded in printing would have traveled a distance before being used; this would have been possible for the pages of a finished book, but not for residues from processing; thus the sheets were stuck to the third Rosenwald sheet near to the time and [14] place of production, Perugia 1501. Based on what we have learned about the fate of this edition, we can also assume that these leftovers from processing were held in reserve for the production of additional copies of the book that because of legal matters were then not fated to be completed; in this case, the related date could extend until 1515; what is certain is that the date could not be earlier than 1501 except possibly by a few months, required to complete the layout of the book.

Would the same considerations apply to the pages of a handwritten book? The first of these clearly does, namely that any pages discarded for errors would quite soon be used for other purposes. The other circumstance is that of an interrupted publishing process due to the fact that the printers of this edition were hauled into court for a case that didn't resolve until 1515. I do not know if some similar problem could have arisen in 1528, with the eventual outcome--perhaps as long as 15 years--of the pages not being used. However there is the additional problem, it seems to me, of ruling out that the occurrence of the dates is not in reference to something recent but of several years before, citing a precedent, perhaps. It would be useful to know more about the context of these dates in the Acts. Perhaps it is not possible. If so, we are left in a state of doubt.

4. Critique of Magio: the Emperor and the Pope


Why should whatever resemblance there is between the Pisanello painting, or the Constance illumination, and the Emperor card lead us to think that the card was painted during Sigismund's tenure as Emperor? In the case of the Cary-Yale and Brera-Brambilla, which is more believably based on Pisanello, the decks were produced, according to all the experts, in the 1440s. This is after Sigismund's death. It is true that Sigismund was worth commemorating in Milan, because he received the Iron Crown there in 1431, a fact only applies to the Milan decks. Sigismund did not even visit Florence or Ferrara, if Magio's report of his itinerary is to be believed. Why should either of these cities commemorate him in particular at all?

The resemblances between the Charles VI Emperor and that of Sigismund's portrait are not in fact that great. They may have been there, such as they are, to give a nod to Sigismund while the differences show a primary intention to paint a generic Emperor. It is possible that these Emperors are modeled on a previous card in the game of "VIII Emperors", recorded in Ferrara in 1423. At that time there was no Emperor, and in fact Sigismund's claim had been undermined by Charles IV's heir-apparent Wenceslaus while the latter was alive (d. 1419). There was no clear Emperor until 1433. Both wore beards, as did Charles IV. Also, it must be remembered that the next emperor wasn't crowned until 1452. Sigimund remains the most current emperor until that date.

The resemblance between the Charles VI Pope and Eugenius IV is more convincing. But why should it only be worth commemorating during his lifetime? Eugenius IV had distinguished himself by residing in both Ferrara, until the plague broke out, and in Florence, the latter for an extended period of five years. That in itself is worth commemorating in a deck from one of those cities. And even this only applies to the Charles VI, not the other decks with similar emperors, because we don't have the popes, if there ever were any, for those decks.

5. Critique of Magio: Are the Palermo Empress and Two of Bastoni from the same deck as the Catania cards?

I have one doubt. All the Catania cards have an orange cast to them. The Palermo cards do not. So I wonder if perhaps the Palermo cards do not belong to the Catania set after all. But I do not know about orange sheens; perhaps they are the result of different storage methods or things they have come into contact with. It would be nice if we had information about the dimensions of the cards, including the thickness, and their backs. However I don't think this matters much. They do seem of the same time and place.

Another criticism I have of Magio is that she fails to take into account evidence that points to Florence as the place of execution for all three decks rather than Ferrara. This evidence, I think, can lead to a better argued dating for these decks. However I will save that for another post.

Re: A Palermo Empress for the "Alessandro Sforza"?

#2
The inner layers were recycled notarial acts on which the dates 1427 and 1428 could clearly be read.
I saw this post in these days, accidently, from July 2015 ... in context of the Goldschmidt-cards
viewtopic.php?f=11&t=691&hilit=goldschm ... =10#p16387

Huck ...
mmfilesi wrote:HI again friends, two questions

a) Somebody have the Delphine and the 5 batons in color?

b) Somebody know what said the phrase in the Bishop?

Image
...
For the other question of Marcos ...
"a) Somebody have the Delphine and the 5 batons in color?"

The 5 of batons in color is in the Hoffmann book.
Recently I presented the golden dolphin ("Delphine") somewhere ... but where?

Ah, here ....
Image

at ...
viewtopic.php?f=11&t=345&start=240#p16324

****************

Added later:

This are the both suspicious places at the bishop card:
One presents clearly a scripture, the other part looks more like some natural break of old color.

Image


Image
Another case of recycled paper?
Huck
http://trionfi.com

Re: A Palermo Empress for the "Alessandro Sforza"?

#3
Palazzo Abatellis was build in 1491-95 ... according ...
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Matteo-Carnelivari
and
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palazzo_Abatellis

"Nel 1526, dopo la morte dei coniugi Abatellis, per volontà testamentaria il palazzo diventò sede di un monastero per donne e furono necessarie molte trasformazioni per adattarlo alla nuova fruizione."
http://www.palermonelmedioevo.com/monum ... tellis.htm

Well, naturally only relevant, if the cards were detected there in "real old conditions", not cause of a function as a museum and gallery ... which actually looks probable:
Pictures of the place:
http://www.veniceweddingphoto.com/palazzo-abatellis/
Huck
http://trionfi.com

Re: A Palermo Empress for the "Alessandro Sforza"?

#4
Thanks for the supplemental research, Huck.

This is the conclusion of my post at viewtopic.php?f=11&t=1112#p17317.

6. Another criticism of Magio (I forgot to include it in my previous post)

She says, "Early tarot sets were produced for special occasions, such as weddings or career advancement". Franco tells me there are no records of tarots ever being given as a wedding presents in Florence. On the other hand, it seems to me that the Visconti had a long history of giving paper products (missals, psalters, etc.) at such occasions, with thinly disguised portraits of themselves as one saint or another. So it depends. We do know that Sigismond Malatesta got a deck shortly after the [changed from "his"--he wasn't there] victory of [changed for "for"] Florence at Anghiari [spelling corrected], which might qualify as a "special occasion".

What else can be said to date the Palermo Empress and other cards mentioned?

7. Events worth commemorating in the life of Alessandro Sforza.

If the deck of present interest was indeed for Alessandro Sforza, as weakly suggested by the Ferrarese diamond ring emblem on the shield (granted by the Estense), and luxury decks were for big occasions, his big military victory was in 1435. In 1444, it is true, he gained Pesaro from Galeazzo Malatesta, but for 20.000 florins, and so coins rather than swords. In 1445. Alessandro suffered a rather devastating defeat at Assisi in 1445. In 1446 his brother Francesco installed him at Parma, but hardly worth commemorating with a King of Swords. The Estense, who whose emblem it was, weren't particularly good at warfare. Borso never had a big victory in battle and was usually on the opposite side from Florence. Ercole studied the martial arts in Naples, but in warfare his only distinction was humiliation in the "salt war" of 1482-4 and never fought a war again.

8. The significance of the "palle" on the Charles VI Chariot.

They are in groups of seven along the lower canopy of the card. Red palle (balls) of various numbers (5 to 8) in a similar pattern on a yellow background was a device of the Medici and in Florence. It is impossible to date the cards by this because even after they got the right to include the French fleur de lys in 1465 (which has nothing to do with the card's use of the fleur de lys on the staff, as it is not part of the "palle" configuration), they continued to use versions without it, e.g. the tomb of Duke Cosimo I has five, per http://www.theflorentine.net/lifestyle/ ... ici-balls/). But the palle at least tends to locate the sponsorship of the Charles VI in Florence, and probably also its production. And thus probably also the cards like them, the Catania. In 1433-34 the supporters of the Medici were rather busy saving Cosimo from first execution and then exile. But after 1435 they had more cause to celebrate, especially after the triumph of being the seat of the Conclave. In this scenario the palle on the chariot might identify, for some, the charioteer, despite his condottiere's hat, with Cosimo, giving him the triumphal entry into Florence that he never had or wanted in real life. I doubt whether the Charles VI was a gift for a young boy, such as Lorenzo, because it was most likely not made mainly for playing with, just looking at. That would be hard even for a boy 13 or 14 year old. (For another possible occasion, see my item 9 below.)

9. An occasion for a deck with Eugenius IV in the Pope card.

An occasion for Eugenius's face being the model for the Pope of the Charles VI might be his residence in the city 1438-1443. The game of triumphs was then illegal in Florence and occasionally the subject of fines. However it was played nonetheless, as Franco Pratesi has shown. One motive for the Charles VI might have been to convince Eugenius that it was an educational game about life and the road to salvation, so as to get the Church to make this exception to its opposition to the proliferation of card games. It wouldn't hurt to put his portrait on the Pope card, to show the importance of the pope, and so Eugenius, in the allegory. This may even have been the first time the Pope appeared in the cards, inserted after the Emperor to show the Pope's superiority. For whatever reason, tarot was added to those very few games that were excluded from the prohibitions the next time the Council considered the matter, in 1450. The exception in 1450 and the previous non-exception from provisions were documented by Franco Pratesi.

10. Relationship of the Palermo Empress with the Rothschild cards, with the similar Emperor.

The Rothschild cards are generally given to Florence. Bellosi in 1985 ("A drawing by Giovanni del Ponte and some tarot cards". Art Bulletin, 1985, 30, pp. 27-35) noted the similarity of the Rothschild Knight of Bastoni to a "St. George and the dragon" painted by Del (or Dal) Ponte (1385-c.1437) in 1434; the two can be seen together at http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-OAmxNlFNtfI/U ... merged.jpg. For more on the Rothschild cards and Dal/Del Ponte, see the thread viewtopic.php?f=11&t=1005.

11. Comparison of the Catania Stag Rider with work of Lo Scheggia and Apollonio di Giovanni.

The comparison of the Stag Rider to a cassone lid by Lo Scheggia (1409-1486), a Florentine artist whose workshop is known to have produced playing cards (in 1447, per Franco Pratesi), was noticed by Huck. Magio in her earlier article saw a resemblance to a c. 1450 Virgil illumination by Apollonio di Giovanni (c. 1416-1465), I think regarding the same feature, male breasts ("pectorals"). Lo Scheggio is said to have had his own workshop starting in 1429. Unfortunately Apollonio's documentation is more meager, starting only in 1456. For pictures, links, and references on Lo Scheggia at viewtopic.php?f=11&t=964. For Apollonio, I used Google.

12. Comparison of the Catania Charioteer with Dal Ponte's "triumph of fame" and Lo Scheggia's Birth Tray.

The full Dal Ponte cassone panel can be seen at http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-xlbf6GdiYPk/U ... anPL25.JPG, which comes from Callman, Apollonio di Giovanni; Callman says that it is "1420s or 1430s" (p. 12). What is significant for the Catania Chariot card are the two "grooms" (or captives), whose legs can be seen on the Catania (http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-JPeIvYIYEI8/U ... L25DET.jpg). The horses are symmetrical, even if their heads point inward instead of outward as on the card. Everything is quite stylized in both. Dal Ponte died in 1437. He could have made the Catania, or something similar; his cassone subjects included Petrarchan themes and the seven virtues. But other considerations (see item 11) point to Lo Scheggia for the Catania itself, and Dal Ponte just for the Rothschild. At a later point in his life Lo Scheggia could also have made the Charles VI, which does not have the grooms but is in general livelier. If the Charles VI was made for the Medici, Lo Scheggio is a known artist for them, doing the Lorenzo "birth tray" of 1449 (no groom, but one captive; two "triumph of fame" illuminations by him, however, do have the two grooms; see viewtopic.php?f=11&t=858&start=60).

I do not know if there was any personal relationship between Dal Ponte and Lo Scheggio. Both are known by nicknames ("By the Bridge" and "The Splinter"). If Lo Scheggio had his own workshop in 1429, he would have been 20 at the time; so I wonder how independent he really was then. As for Apollonio, his "triumph of fame" has the two grooms but in a very different depiction; I notice that Apollonio has a "naked boys", c. 1450-1460, similar to the famous one by Lo Scheggio, c. 1450, but pulling on poppy seed pods. Apollonio seems to have used Scheggia motifs.

Magio sees the Catania and the Charles VI as essentially the same in style. To me the Charles VI seems more the characteristically Renaissance style initiated by Lo Scheggio's brother Massacchio, and the Rothschild Emperor a whole epoch away, flat and medieval compared to the illusion of depth, as a result of shading, in the Charles VI. The Palermo Empress complements the Rothschild Emperor. The Catania cards seem of the same time period or a little later.

13. How the cards fit into my hypothesis for the development of the tarot. out of 16 special cards in Milan.

For myself, I like to see the card and its deck in terms of the point of view I expressed in the thread about Pratesi's notes on the Cary-Yale (notably my post at viewtopic.php?f=11&t=1086&start=30#p16731), namely, that the 16 triumphs of the Visconti-inspired deck-type, seen later in the Cary-Yale, came to Florence in the early to middle 1430s. Florence then added other subjects to one version of the deck, while removing the theological version and Prudence. Another version kept all four but also added the new ones and at some point even more, to become Minchiate. The "Alessandro Sforza" would be an expression of the tarot at the earlier state of development, earlier than the "Charles VI" and as early as within a couple of years of the Rothschild, c. 1435. At least so far, there are no surviving cards in the "Alessandro Sforza" that are not part of the Cary-Yale's hypothesized 16. That deck may still have had the theologicals plus prudence, a possibility entertained by Magio in her other article (p. 229 for Charity, but not very convincing). Then we see the replacements for the theologicals in the otherwise similar but somewhat later "Charles VI." Or, conceivably, the substitutions were already made by the time of the "Alessandro Sforza" and are now lost.

Needless to say, all this is still rather hypothetical, with many alternative scenarios. But the dates on the paper used to make the Palermo Empress and the manner of her depiction (similar to the Rothschild Emperor) have been a big help in fitting various extant cards into the slots it provides. I end up with roughly the same dating as Magio for the Catania and Palermo, 1435-1438, reaffirming the connection to Alessandro Sforza, but the next decade for the Charles VI, for the Medici. There remains, to be sure, much uncertainty about dates and deck composition, but much less so about place. Given the long life of the Scheggia workshop, until at least 1470, some or all of the Charles VI might even be "added cards", as the tarot grew, but by the same shop and done so as to blend in with the others. It may even at some point have had an Empress.

Re: A Palermo Empress for the "Alessandro Sforza"?

#5
mikeh wrote: 6. Another criticism of Magio (I forgot to include it in my previous post)

She says, "Early tarot sets were produced for special occasions, such as weddings or career advancement". Franco tells me there are no records of tarots ever being given as a wedding presents in Florence. On the other hand, it seems to me that the Visconti had a long history of giving paper products (missals, psalters, etc.) at such occasions, with thinly disguised portraits of themselves as one saint or another. So it depends. We do know that Sigismond Malatesta got a deck shortly after his victory for Florence at Angieri, which might qualify as a "special occasion".
I once saw a book about Maximilian, in which the day of the wedding was described - long ago, when I wasn't so much interested. I remember the detail, that Bianca Maria Sforza brought playing cards for this opportunity and that the playing cards were discussed by Bianca Maria and Maximilian. The book was careful done, according documents.
I attempted to find the book again, but failed. My suspicion is, that this report is from a Venetian diplomat, who observed the wedding.
In the Regesten of Maximilian I found the note, that Bianca Maria and Maximilian played cards at the the next day.

A further example is the well known deck from a Oberrheinischer Stecher, which was done for the wedding of his daughter 1496. The deck is still extant. British Museum. It has Pomegranates as a suit, cause Spain had taken Granada in 1492.
http://www.wopc.co.uk/germany/sge

7. Events worth commemorating in the life of Alessandro Sforza.

If the deck of present interest was indeed for Alessandro Sforza, as weakly suggested by the Ferrarese diamond ring emblem on the shield (granted by the Estense), and luxury decks were for big occasions, his big military victory was in 1435. In 1444, it is true, he gained Pesaro from Galeazzo Malatesta, but for 20.000 florins, and so coins rather than swords. In 1445. Alessandro suffered a rather devastating defeat at Assisi in 1445. In 1446 his brother Francesco installed him at Parma, but hardly worth commemorating with a King of Swords. The Estense, who whose emblem it was, weren't particularly good at warfare. Borso never had a big victory in battle and was usually on the opposite side from Florence. Ercole studied the martial arts in Naples, but in warfare his only distinction was humiliation in the "salt war" of 1482-4 and never fought a war again.
Alessandro Sforza was still active as a condottiero (variously) in the 1460s, especially in the war around Naples. He was victorious, cause the Anjou stopped their engagement.
http://www.condottieridiventura.it/inde ... dro-sforza
http://www.condottieridiventura.it/inde ... /2724-1460
Battle of Troia, 18 August 1462, Alessandro Sforza as leading general
active still in October 1463 against Anjou ..."Con la resa di Sigismondo Pandolfo Malatesta ottiene la signoria di Gradara e di Castelnuovo. Combatte ancora gli angioini in Puglia, occupa San Severo e Manfredonia. La seconda località è sottoposta a sacco."
8. The significance of the "palle" on the Charles VI Chariot.

They are in groups of seven along the lower canopy of the card. Red palle (balls) of various numbers (5 to 8) in a similar pattern on a yellow background was a device of the Medici and in Florence. It is impossible to date the cards by this because even after they got the right to include the French fleur de lys in 1465 (which has nothing to do with the card's use of the fleur de lys on the staff, as it is not part of the "palle" configuration), they continued to use versions without it, e.g. the tomb of Duke Cosimo I has five, per http://www.theflorentine.net/lifestyle/ ... ici-balls/). But the palle at least tends to locate the sponsorship of the Charles VI in Florence, and probably also its production. And thus probably also the cards like them, the Catania. In 1433-34 the supporters of the Medici were rather busy saving Cosimo from first execution and then exile. But after 1435 they had more cause to celebrate, especially after the triumph of being the seat of the Conclave. In this scenario the palle on the chariot might identify, for some, the charioteer, despite his condottiere's hat, with Cosimo, giving him the triumphal entry into Florence that he never had or wanted in real life. I doubt whether the Charles VI was a gift for a young boy, such as Lorenzo, because it was most likely not made mainly for playing with, just looking at. That would be hard even for a boy 13 or 14 year old. (For another possible occasion, see my item 9 below.)
hm ... you underestimate the value if of "playing cards were made for young people and women" in this period. Games are generally more something for young persons than for older, also nowadays. Really good Go-players are between 20-30, after this age they can be still good, but that is not the rule.

****************

"" The inner layers were recycled notarial acts on which the dates 1427 and 1428 could clearly be read.""

It doesn't naturally mean, that the two cards were made around this time. We don't have a picture of this detail. We don't have the full size of the Empress card. We can't see, to which degree the card is similar to the Charles VI. It makes no sense to speculate too much on a state of "not complete information".

The Correr Museum ...

Image


.. Tarocchi (Kaplan I p. 123) might be also called "similar" to

Image
Huck
http://trionfi.com

Re: A Palermo Empress for the "Alessandro Sforza"?

#6
Alessandro Sforza deck: The figures are all more or less blond and the hair has always extreme curls.

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image


Image


In the Temperance picture (the last) we see the curious form of breasts, which also appears on one of the Scheggia Cassione pictures:

Image


... well, that formed the suspicion that Scheggia was the painter of the Alessandro Sforza cards, but possibly also the painter of the Charles VI, cause he painted the birth tray of Lorenzo. Pratesi's detection of Scheggia as playing cards producer in 1447 contributed to this idea.

The Charles VI mainly used brown hairs ....

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image


.. and the hairs have curl, but less intensive as in the Alessandro Sforza deck.

Emperor and hermit have grey hairs (not presented). Only the lady of the Sun card has blond hairs:

Image


Only the triumphator of the chariot has black hairs and the two cardinals:

Image
Image


The color of the hairs doesn't seem to be accidental. Blond hairs for the Sun card makes natural sense. Black hairs as contrast to blond for the most honored person makes also sense. Black hairs for the 2 cardinals possibly indicates, that the Medici could imagine, that one of the family might also would become a cardinal once (which realized a generation later, and not only that, 2 Medici became even pope).
The hair of the figures has mostly curls, but not in the extreme way as the figures in Alessandro cards.

Well, the painter of the Alessandro cards prefered blond and extreme curled hairs. Perhaps this was the special wish of the commissioner.

*************

Image


The empress and the two connected female servants seem to have blond and curled hairs, which adds to the suspicion, that the card might have belonged to the Alessandro cards.

************

Francesco Sforza desired, that a weak Ferrante should rule in Naples and not a strong French house. So he assisted Ferrante and Alessandro Sforza was a leading general in the fights. The result of the success became the marriage of Ippolita to Ferrante's son, which was planned in May 1465. The bride journey crossed Florence during the Giovanni festivities in 1465. The bride journey was disrupted a longer time, cause Ferrante had killed Jacopo Piccinino, Sforza's son-in-law. Nonetheless it happened. Ippolita married and brought some Northern culture to Souther Italy. From other records we know of Trionfi cards in Naples in the mid 1470s. From here some cards might have gone to Sicily.
Alfonso the Great (Alfonso V.) has ruled in Aragon, Sicily and Naples (till 1458). Ferrante only got Naples, Sicily went to the Spanish Aragon. Nonetheless it's possible, that a deck went to Sicily, perhaps with some involvement of Alessandro Sforza.
Huck
http://trionfi.com

Re: A Palermo Empress for the "Alessandro Sforza"?

#7
Thanks for the critique, Huck.

I agree that Lo Scheggia probably did both the "Alessandro Sforza" and the "Charles VI". I agree that the Charles VI is later than the "Alessandro Sforza". I also agree that it is not established that the Palermo cards are from the same deck as the Catania group of the "Alessandro Sforza".

But Lo Scheggia had a long career, running his own shop from 1429 til around 1470. The question is, when in that period, for each of the two? The 1428 on the "Alessandro" Stag Rider is suggestive of an earlier date, 1430s or perhaps 1440s rather than 1460s. The similarity to the Palermo (with its 1427 and 1428 written in it) and Rothschild (with its Emperor much like the Empress, and also the Knight like the 1434 St. George) also are consistent with an earlier date. Likewise, Alessandro's big victory was in 1435, when he was the age of the King of Swords on the card, even if he also had some at various other times, including the 1460s (although more like stalemates then, not regaining territory lost).

All this is contingent on the 1427-1428 meaning something. I only want to say that they reasonably might, not that they prove anything. The circumstances in relation to the cards as presented are reasonably compatible with a 1435-1440 dating of the "Alessandro Sforza" and a few years later for the "Charles VI."

My point about the implausibility of the "Charles VI" being a gift for Lorenzo at 14 is that it is not a deck for playing. It is a deck to be admired. A 14 year old wants to use a deck, not admire it. There is also perhaps a political message vis a vis the Pope card, which clearly resembles Eugenius IV. There isn't much point in such a resemblance 20 years after he was in Florence, 15 years after his death. It would make more sense to put in the pope then in office.

Re: A Palermo Empress for the "Alessandro Sforza"?

#8
mikeh wrote:Thanks for the critique, Huck.

I agree that Lo Scheggia probably did both the "Alessandro Sforza" and the "Charles VI".
All, what we know, this looks like a probable solution. We have no other suggestion, or?
I agree that the Charles VI is later than the "Alessandro Sforza". I also agree that it is not established that the Palermo cards are from the same deck as the Catania group of the "Alessandro Sforza".
I think, that the Charles VI (1463 ?) is earlier than the Alessandro deck (1465 or later). The curled blond hairs seem to suggest, that Catania and Palermo have parts of the same deck (or the same deck type). But I think, it is correct to assume this not automatically.
But Lo Scheggia had a long career, running his own shop from 1429 til around 1470. The question is, when in that period, for each of the two? The 1428 on the "Alessandro" Stag Rider is suggestive of an earlier date, 1430s or perhaps 1440s rather than 1460s.
I thought, that the empress card has the years 1427/1428 ... But I see now, that you're correct, you wrote "As further confirmation, she says that the Stag Rider, of the Catania group, also shows traces of writing and the date 1428, as "accidentally discovered by the staff at Castello Ursino in 2014"."
Hm, this changes a lot, and it becomes rather suggestive, that both card documents (Catania / Palermo) are just from the same deck. What else can one read on the cards? There must be some text, that gave the suspicion of "notarial acts." Without knowing this, it's not wise, to speculate too much.

One doesn't know, at which date the paper with notarial acts was recycled. This might have happened in 1428, of course, but also 20, 50 or even 100 years later. If it are official documents, they could have been kept a long time, before somebody thought it appropriate to use it for another interest. A similar case happened with the cards found in Ronciglione, I remember, also a case, in which juridical papers were involved for the dating.
The similarity to the Palermo (with its 1427 and 1428 written in it) and Rothschild (with its Emperor much like the Empress, and also the Knight like the 1434 St. George) also are consistent with an earlier date. Likewise, Alessandro's big victory was in 1435, when he was the age of the King of Swords on the card, even if he also had some at various other times, including the 1460s (although more like stalemates then, not regaining territory lost).

All this is contingent on the 1427-1428 meaning something. I only want to say that they reasonably might, not that they prove anything. The circumstances in relation to the cards as presented are reasonably compatible with a 1435-1440 dating of the "Alessandro Sforza" and a few years later for the "Charles VI."
Well, it's better to get the facts first.
Do you know this?
http://www.academia.edu/7722673/The_Sta ... of_Catania
My point about the implausibility of the "Charles VI" being a gift for Lorenzo at 14 is that it is not a deck for playing. It is a deck to be admired. A 14 year old wants to use a deck, not admire it. There is also perhaps a political message vis a vis the Pope card, which clearly resembles Eugenius IV. There isn't much point in such a resemblance 20 years after he was in Florence, 15 years after his death. It would make more sense to put in the pope then in office.
The Charles VI pope hasn't a threefold Triara.
Huck
http://trionfi.com

Re: A Palermo Empress for the "Alessandro Sforza"?

#10
Huck wrote,
The Charles VI pope hasn't a threefold Triara.
I don't understand your point. The threefold Tiara was a later papal fashion, not an earlier.

Huck wrote,
Extreme blond, extreme curls. The time is interesting: I saw datings between 1462-1480. Possibly a fashion around this time.
Assuming that this picture is 1462 or so, that doesn't suggest anything about the Charles VI, etc., even as a reasonable possibility. You would have to provide a preponderence of comparable paintings of an earlier time that do not have blond hair and curls where they would be expected to be. You would have to look, for example, at the Cary-Yale cards for example (early 1440s, presumably). Have a look. Plenty of blonds, exactly like in the Florentine cards. Northern Italy had been conquered by Germanic tribes in which blond was more prevalent than in the native stock, especially slaves become serfs, who were drawn from conquered nations of mostly darker hue (Africa and Asia, despite the depictions of blond and blue eyed Jesuses). So blond was the preferred hair color of the ruling class. as well as being considered more beautiful. In the Lo Scheggia birth tray, for example, there is one dark-skinned person, hence a slave or captive.

Added: yes, I know Maggia's article on the Stag Rider. I referred to it, for the reference to Apollonio de Giovanni as her suggestion for the artist (I think Lo Scheggia is more likely myself). However I spelled "Maggio" wrong (as "Magio"). I'll correct that.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

cron