Re: Pratesi on birth trays

mjhurst wrote: As the highest card in a Tarot trump sequence, the World triumphs over all the ranks of man and circumstances of life. It triumphs over Death and the Devil and the End Times, including Resurrection to Final Judgment (surgite ad judicium). That last part is important -- it triumphs over the Last Judgment. Any rational interpretation must take that context into account: what comes after the Last Judgment? What kind of "world" comes next... let's say, in Revelation 21:1?
So the post-mortal New World needs moated cities and armored knights? And commerce as well, as the landscape features a busy coast, its ports attended to by ships on the SEA…all of which is an approximation of Rev. 21:1: “Then I saw ‘a new heaven and a new earth,’ for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and there was no longer any sea.”? [Face palm]
mjhurst wrote: In the case of the Cary-Yale World card, we see a stylized "world" on the bottom half of the card and an allegorical figure on the top half.
So you can’t name the “allegorical figure” but can nonetheless interpret this card? Let me help you out – the undulating cloud nimbus beneath the “allegorical” figure is the exact same color and pattern as that nimbus around her father, Filippo Visconti, as found in his portion of the Visconti Hours (the similar third bust to the far right is Giangaleazzo - its a "family thing": a way of showing their connection to the divine, "divine right" or rather bon droyt):
mjhurst wrote: Between the two registers, literally "crowning" the world, is a large golden crown. This announces that it is the New World of Revelation. The figure above holds another golden crown in one hand and a winged trumpet in the other. This is the Crown of Life, which is bestowed upon faithful Christians, (i.e., the reward which comes after judgment). A winged trumpet alludes to Fama, but in context here it suggests eternal glory rather than mere worldly renown, the transient gloria mundi, vainglory.
Given the relatively large extent of Visconti manuscripts, not least being the Visconti Hours, would you mind showing us an example, if not the winged trumpet with the Crown of Life, just the Crown of Life itself? Or maybe the crown is that ducal crown which decorated Filippo’s person on every relief, medal, etc. that represented him:
mjhurst wrote: As for the details of the world scene, there is little doubt that the rider with his banner, the boat, and the fisherman were intended to convey some secondary meaning. This might have been something general/allegorical or perhaps something specific/quotidian, a topical reference to some particular person or event. In either case, figuring out the reference will add a bit to our understanding of the creator's purpose but just a bit. Overall, we know what the card represents in the context of the overall cycle.
Perfect, a full admission of your method – God is not in the details of the item in question but in your schema, “ranks of man” set in a Christian eschatology (I don’t deny either as the worldview within which a more specific statement is being made, but neither of those concepts adequately explain the CY's “World” trump).

A Filippo Visconti medal, perhaps exactly contemporary with the CY deck (it dates to 1441) – note the ducal crown yet again on the shoulder and the object lauded on the reverse: a knight (or more properly a 3 person ‘lance’), with a prominent city beyond the hills (which I take to be Visconti’s age-old nemesis of Venice, beyond the Bergamasque Alps [from Milan’s East-facing perspective], also vying for Sforza’s allegiance).

Full view here in link: ... 4796_0.jpg

Unfortunately the CY “World’s” knight’s banner is worn badly – the underlying green shows almost throughout - but there are definite traces of white with a sinuous blue line on it – likely the biscione on the primary battle standard of Visconti, as seen on his armorials throughout the Visconti Hours (the center and right images below) and elsewhere. Sforza would have been expected to carry it into battle on behalf of Visconti after marrying his daughter.

The court cards, displaying Visconti and Sforza stemmi, are not the trumps (which, however, show the same stemmi, rather randomly) but they are most certainly part of the context…and the context was dynastic succession: who would marry Filippo’s daughter (he would be dead just 6 years after her marriage to Sforza)? After shopping her around to Ferrara, Filippo got the man he really wanted as his chief condottiero, Sforza…and gave him a critical city between Milan and Venice: Cremona. This fundamental and undeniable armorial aspect of the CY deck's was recognized by both Kaplan (The Encyclopedia of Tarot, Vo. I, 1978: 107) and Dummett:
The Visconti di Modrone [CY] pack shares an exceptional feature with the Visconti-Sforza deck as well: both swords are straight on the numeral cards of that suit, not curved in the usual Italian manner, as in the Brambilla pack. More importantly, both Visconti and Sforza emblems appear on the garments of the court figures: the Visconti ducal crown with fronds and a dove in the cup and coin suits, respectively; the Sforza quince branch and fountain in the sword and baton suits. (M. Dummett, The Visconti-Sforza Tarot Cards, 1986: 13)

To say there is no connection between the court cards and the purpose of the trumps’ highest court card that reiterates the same Visconti emblems, is an untenable theory if one can acknowledge that the crown is none other than the Crown of the Duchy of Milan (a principality obsessed with princely crowns, not allegorical ones -


Re: Pratesi on birth trays and now cassone

Here is my translation of Franco's new note complementing his one on birth trays. The original, "1450ca:
Firenze – Trionfi e cassoni nuziali", is at

In advance I want to say that this note was an eye-opener for me, merely by the questions it asks. That is, he says, "Besides looking for triumphs among the cassoni, why not also look for cassoni among the triumphs?" Busy looking for triumphs among cassoni, such a question never occurred to me.

On that subject, for people with access to JSTOR (and if you don't, you should, it's free), I recommend highly the article cited by Franco by Brucia Witthoft,"Marriage Rituals and Marriage Chests in Quattrocento Florence", Artibus et Historiae, Vol. 3, No. 5 (1982), pp. 43-59.

In translating the word "istoriati" (as "historiated"), I used Jerzy Miziolek's "Cassoni istoriati with "Torello and Saladin": Observations on the Origins of a New Genre of Trecento Art in Florence", Studies in the History of Art, Vol. 61, Symposium Papers XXXVIII: Italian Panel Painting of the Duecento and Trecento (2002), pp. 442-469. The word is defined in relation to the illustrations that occur at the initial letters of illuminated manuscripts that also relate in some way to the text that follows, illustrating some aspect of it. An historiated cassone would in some way be analogous to that. Whether it necessarily refers to a text (what text?), or maybe just an idea, or has to tell a story, I do not know. I wonder if tarot cards could be considered "historiated"? Added later: On the meaning of "istoriati", Franco tells me:
The text or any writing is never involved. Istoriare means to decorate with historical motifs, illustrations of important events of the past. The meaning can in case be extended to any picture, not only of historical concern.
In what follows below, comments in brackets are mine.

C. 1450 - Trionfi and marriage chests

1. Introduction

The object of this study is the chest, cassone, of the Renaissance, a trunk or big forziere [the 15th century word for "cassone"] containing the trousseau of the bride, transported in a public procession to the groom's house, where it remained as a useful piece of furniture beside the bed. Florentine cassoni had a remarkable expansion in Florence, especially in the second half of the fifteenth century; then in the nineteenth century they became highly sought-after items for collections, and specimens are found scattered in many museums and private collections, in various regions of Europe and America. The specialized literature on this topic is very rich: even the simplest among the catalogs of the various exhibitions devoted to these objects usually end with several pages of bibliographical references.

Our interest in the topic is, however, very limited, and only a small part of the specific literature will be used; our main attention indeed is directed mainly to the initial spread of triumphal motifs in the decoration of wedding chests. A similar study was previously dedicated to birth trays; here the objects are different, but the underlying issue for us remains the same as that at the basis of the previous study: "A different question, which however can be very relevant for our field of the history of playing cards is when triumphal images began to be used in the decoration of these objects." In short, also in the case of the cassoni it would be particularly useful to be able to go back to the time when triumphal motifs were adopted in the decoration and possibly find their rationales, all with the ultimate aim of better reconstructing the introduction of the triumphs among playing cards.

1. Decorations with triumphs

For birth trays of the fifteenth century, we saw that the appearance of triumphal motifs in Florence could be placed at the middle of the century, with a very large flowering that came virtually at once. In particular, it was found useful to reproduce the following quote from the monograph by Cecilia De Carli 2.
Towards the middle of the fifteenth century birth trays showed a change in the cultural situation that radically abandons the romantic idyll of virtus et voluptas present in the Gardens of Love, in Amorous hunts, in stories of the Ninfale Fiesolano or Teseida, whose main reference was Boccaccio. In its place we find Virgil, Homer, Petrarch, whose triumphs unfold the soul's progress from love to chastity, fame, plotting, in a sense, the new iconography of birth trays and chests, whose authors are the professionals lo Scheggia, brother of Masaccio, and Apollonio di Giovanni, with their respective workshops. (p. 29.)
It can be seen that at the end of this same quote on the birth trays, cassoni are named. Now we really have to check this correspondence between trays and chests. It so happens that in the catalog of a recent exhibition on Florentine cassoni 3 we meet a presentation that closely recalls what we had found for the trays.
The heart of the exhibition, however, is made up of the golden age of the painting of cassoni, that vast world which exploded the mid fifteenth century in Florence and also echoed in the words that Vasari dedicated to this production, recognizing its specificity and excellence, in the Life of Dello Delli. Petrarch took the place of Boccaccio, I Trionfi succeeded the Amorosa Visione, heroic themes of classical history and mythology widened the spectrum from Ovid moralized, effortlessly updating what had been the fashion all over Europe towards 1400. Through the domestic painting of the cassoni, myth and the classical heritage became shared history more and more familiar. (P. 20.)
We ought then to verify and extend this presentation, also trying to frame as precisely as possible its initial stages.
2 C. De Carli, I deschi da parto e la pittura del primo Rinascimento toscano [Birth trays and the painting of the early Tuscan Renaissance]. Torino 1997.
3 A. De Marchi, L. Sbaraglio (ed), Le opere e i giorni [Works and days]. Signa 2015.

3. Preliminary comments on the specific literature

As already mentioned, the literature on wedding cassoni is very extensive, but this may also be justified by the complication of the field under consideration. In particular, cassoni were generally produced in pairs, but these have rarely come down to us intact; as a rule we only have one of the front or side panels, and it remains impossible to reconstruct the entire scene of the original depiction. We must also take account of the intervention in this area of heavy restorations, complete renovations, even real counterfeits.

From the documents we hear of many works of this kind, but very few have been preserved; complicating things is the fact that as a rule these works are unsigned, and it is only thanks to the proposals of the various experts who come to widely shared agreement on attributions. Usually, the main task that the majority of historians set was therefore to discuss and re-discuss the attribution of the works described, and it seems that agreeing on these attributions has been and still remains rather difficult. In most cases it is objectively impossible to go back to the artist's hand in the decoration; at most it goes back to the style of the master in whose workshop the cassone was produced, perhaps with the help of many students of a variety of experience. Related discussions multiply and do not proceed in a linear fashion, but with frequent changes of mind and at least partial reworking of proposals already deemed outdated; if one intended to reconstruct in order of originality, in a complete and correct manner, all the proposals recurrently advanced over time, the task would take years of careful study. Even in recent times, thanks to increased attention paid to artistic products of the minor arts, scholars in the field present much laborious activiy, although only infrequently are new elements presented. Fortunately there are two favorable situations that allow a rapid advancement of our research.

The first advantageous situation arises ... from ignorance, that is, by the fact that the professional world of art historians can be seen from the outside, without the obligations of gratitude towards teachers or consideration towards colleagues or academic procedures; we can be permitted, as amateurs, to advance without restrictions, choosing

the contributions that have been most useful for our purpose, without accompanying them with a critical analysis of the originality of the contributions themselves, let alone the many not considered. (It must on the other hand be recognized that this undoubted "advantage" is accompanied by the drawback that we will only be able to reflect on work already second hand, without adding here to the purpose anything not already known.)

The second factor that simplifies our study is the limitation to triumphal motifs present in the decoration of cassoni, with the added temporal confinement to an era - towards the end of the first half of the fifteenth century - which for many cassoni is revealed as very early, so as to leave only a limited number available for discussion. In virtually all the exhibition catalogs on this issue and all the monographs on cassoni can be found some specimens with triumphal motifs in their decoration; however, many of these cassoni and related discussions can be neglected because they are too late to be of help (and this happens quite often), or because the author of the description does not dwell enough on our specific theme.

4. Observations from the publications on trionfi

Before entering into a discussion of the contributions utilized by the literature on cassoni, we should recall another way of accessing potentially useful literature, one way for some alternative ways: instead of looking for triumphs among the cassoni, why not look for cassoni among the triumphs? In fact, if you take into consideration the most complete works dedicated to triumphs, it is inevitable that we will also meet "our" cassoni. A search has therefore been made also in this direction.

So for example we already meet various chests discussed in a pioneering book on the triumphs 4; However, for our purposes, the treatment of cassoni is revealed in that case too dispersed among the various works of art considered; in addition, the same structuring of the triumphs as pertain to the military genre, classical or Christian imitation, does not appear quite suitable for us. Among other things, the author also points out (p. 84) that one cannot draw a dividing line between
4 W. Weisbach, Trionfi. Berlin 1919.

allegorical and mythological triumphs (Zwischen den allegorischen und den lässt sich keine mythologischen Triumphs scharfe Trennungslinie ziehen), so that all the triumphs of our interest end up being included in one group. A much more extensive discussion is encountered in a noted large book of Giovanni Carandente 5 in which many cassoni areare presented and also discussed. The examples are reported with attributions that in most cases appear outdated today, and without following the chronological order that would help; but what is rare is primarily a specific discussion limited to the triumphs in cassoni and their first diffusion, despite the fact the the findings are recalled that led to the recognition of the specific activity of the workshop of Matteo [Marco?] Il Buono and Apollonio di Giovanni.

Something of interest can be found in a recent book, much easier to utilize, by Zaho 6. The author reasonably begins her discussion with the triumphs of the classical era, passes rapidly to developments related to humanism and directs the main part of her work to the new use of triumphs as a personal celebration on the part of some famous lords of the Renaissance: Alfonso of Aragon, Sigismondo Malatesta (whom we also know well in our field of the triumphs among playing cards), Federico da Montefeltro, Battista Sforza, and Borso d'Este.
By the middle of the fifteenth century, the idea of the truimph began to take on more complex and enigmatic overtones. The strict adherence to Petrarch’s literary vision gave way to more personal and private interpretations of the idea of triumph. It came to be used as a commentary on the lives and events of private individuals. The triumphal motif was no longer viewed as a simple decorative theme, but instead became a vehicle by which an artist or patron could construct a personal image. Moreover, this ability to manipulate and individualize the classically inspired Christian allegory of the Triumph became the impetus for Italian Renaissance rulers to appropriate and promote it for their own use. (p. 45.)
This particular transformation of triumphs is suggested by the middle of the fifteenth century, but any developments go beyond the period of our interest. We hope for more accurate and detailed information from the literature devoted to the cassoni themselves.
5 G. Carandente, I trionfi nel primo Rinascimento. Torino 1963.
6 M. A. Zaho, Imago triumphalis: the function and significance of triumphal imagery for Italian Renaissance rulers. New York etc. 2004.

5. First observations on the studies published on cassoni

The following are various opinions of the experts on the subject of our interest. As mentioned above, it will not be a systematic analysis, and the criterion adopted is simply to rely on the works from which the information was obtained (in fact, the sources consulted were more numerous than those which are mentioned here explicitly). A good starting point for the study of cassoni is usually considered the extensive work of Paul Schubring, published in Leipzig in 1915 and a revised edition in 1923 7. In fact, in the second edition, there is a three-page short chapter (pp. 58- 60) dedicated to triumphs, but the obtainable information is not sufficient for us. The author's assertion that he devoted just those few pages to the topic may appear strange, since precisely on the theme of triumphs much had already been written in the past (today on triumphs we could overlook all of them). However Schubring signals a difference among triumphal motifs with heroes or of Petrarchan derivation in pictorial representations: "In der Malerei spiegelten sich diese Aufzüge nach zwei Seiten: in den Triumphs Petrarcas und in den der Heroen Triumphs". ["In painting, these motifs were reflected in two directions: in the Triumphs of Petrarch and in the triumphs of heroes"]. The author also lists a series of themes, seen as possible groupings of the various characters depicted in the triumphs: the Old Testament; gods; Roman history; Greek history; contemporary history.

A large study devoted specifically to cassoni appears much more useful to us: the thesis of Paul Watson, completed at Yale University in 1970 8. Going back in time by nearly half a century, we find ourselves, among other statements, many similar to those which are met in recent catalogs and monographs.
Most of the subjects popular during the first decades of the fifteenth century disappeared abruptly around 1450. There were no Gardens of Love, nor any of its variants, no Allegorical Chases, and no amatory romances of the type of Theseida and the Ninfale Fiesolano. No tales from the Decameron survived, with one significant exception. Boccaccio was replaced by Vergil and Homer, and by Petrarch, whose Triumphs limning the progress of the soul from love
7 P. Schubring, Cassoni (Zweite Auflage). Leipzig 1923.
8 P. F. Watson, Virtus and voluptas in cassone painting. Phil. Diss. Yale University, New Haven 1970.

to chastity to fame, were almost a summary of the iconographic history of cassone painting. (p. 225.)
Watson also goes into detail and studies the writings of the humanists in relation to marriage and married life. He considers rightly Apollonio di Giovanni as the main protagonist (to which we would willingly add today Scheggia).

The author also discusses a particular observaton, which also is found in other works on the subject: initially the decoration of the chests was based on the separation of the long rectangle of the front panel into several sectors more comparable to a square shape; only in a second time was it preferred to use the whole, all the available long panel, connected with the possibility of depicting more extensive and complex scenes. This transformation occurred shortly before that of the subjects preferred, more of our interest.

As for this appearance of scenes the full length of the panel, Andrea De Marchi noted two artists who were responsible respectively for a first introduction (Giovanni Toscani) and a subsequent attainment of its full value (Scheggia), about twenty years after 9.
It will then be a painter as exquisite and sparkling as Giovanni di Francesco Toscani, who generally dedicated his best energies, to codify in the third decade a type where the splitting of the narrative expands and unifies, laying the solid foundation for what will be an asset of Florentine stained cassoni. (p. 17.)
It is only, however, with lo Scheggia that the exquisitely roaming system of Tasconi’s cassoni is governed by a tighter setting, measured by the lances of shadow projected to the ground, by the colorful interlocking of expertly foreshortened architectures of scales varying in proportion to the figures. (P. 22.)
We are more interested in the almost simultaneous change in the subjects, with the introduction of triumphal ones in particular. As responsible for the first indication of the transformation of the subjects and style at the mid-century, Watson in the aforementioned thesis refers in a note on Schubring.
The shift in subject matter and style was first noticed by Schubring, 106, who called the mid-century the “heroic” age of painting, as distinct from the

9 A. De Marchi, Ref, of note 3.

romantic one immediately preceding it. (p. 496.)
A brief summary of the second edition of the pioneering work of Schubring on cassoni, already mentioned, was not sufficient to detect an observation of that kind. With the help of Watson’s notes we can see what actually there at p. 160 of Schubring’s book of 1923: The reference, rather compact,is included above all with a cassone of the Battle of Anghiari, so that the new style displayed in fact dates back to the middle of the century; All the same, the importance of that change does not appear stressed enough.

However, already in 1970 what is found is not only the observation of the change but also the study of the moral treatises of the humanists and the connection of the culture in that environment with the change of cassone style, This seems already a sufficiently distant starting point for the numerous repetitions of those same concepts that we find in subsequent studies. In short, the phenomenon of the change in style, which had been found in relation to the birth trays at the middle of the fifteenth century, is actually considered less valid for cassoni, and of this the experts have been aware for decades. An important contribution to the study of the cassoni is in the book by Ellen Callmann, Apollonio di Giovanni 10. The theme of triumphs, after an already interesting presentation, is treated in detail, as copied below.
Triumphs became an important manifestation in Renaissance art. The humanists, reviving an interest in ancient authors, acquainted their contemporaries with the Roman practices and themselves wrote extensively on Roman history and customs. This new interest was not purely a literary one. A few contemporary heroes were actually given ‘triumphs’, and public pageants on occasion included re-creations of Roman triumphs. These lavish spectacles had an important impact on art and many artists contributed designs for them. By the fifties this revival, both in literature and in performance, was in full swing but as yet it had not penetrated the visual arts to any great extent. Secular art was still severely limited, the first extensive undertaking in this area being the decoration of the Palazzo Medici in the late fifties, so that cassoni were quite naturally in the vanguard of the movement. (p. 45.)
10 E. Callmann, Apollonio di Giovanni. Oxford 1974.

Unfortunately, the extensive discussion thus introduced for us loses much of its interest, in particular addressing the flowering of the subject after the middle of the century.

Comments more or less similar on the transition in preferred themes centered on the middle of the century (but in some cases at a somewhat earlier date) are found in several other studies. A rather simplified vision is met in a nice book about cassoni that also discusses triumphs in a chapter that is entirely devoted to the recurring themes in decoration 11. The description appears schematized in a very simple way: the predominance of themes chosen by brides until the middle of the century and by the grooms after.
'l'riionfi are indeed a common cassone subject. These processions were an aristocratic way of marking valour, often modelled on ancient Roman precedents, as a reminder to participants that Renaissance Italy was the heir to the glories of Rome. If a wedding on a cassone might be a suitable theme for a bride-to-be, then a display of masculine bravery or virtù would please the future groom. (p. 101.)

By the middle of the quattrocento, voluptas and virtù often lived together on cassoni, but by the last half of the century virtù came to be seen as the forerunner quality. The wav to understand virtù, a mixture of nobility and courage, was not through one single image of beautiful love, but through the recreation of dramatic personal exploits. The complicated sources for cassoni ideas can be further simplified. During the first half of the century cassoni idealised women; the second half turned men into heroes. Static love yielded to dynamic action. Passive became active, female voluptas was extinguished by male virtù. (pp. 97-98.)

The schema shown corresponds to several earlier proposals, which are in agreement in outline but differ in aspects not entirely secondary, such as the motivation or the precise dates associated with the signaled transition.

6. Hypothetical connections

With the help of the literature already utilized and other works that will be referred to below, we outline some basic elements for discussion. As already are seen for birth trays, starting in the
11 G. Hughes, Renaissance cassoni. Polegate and London 1997.

mid-fifteenth century, also for cassoni there was a significant increase in their diffusion in general, and particularly those decorated with triumphal motifs, with changes in style and prevalent motifs. Researching possible motivations, different suggestions can be found, summarized below.

Military triumph

A first possibility concerns the connection of the triumphant decoration of the cassone with some contemporary military victory. An association of this kind has been suggested for example for the appearance of the triumphs of the cards soon after the Battle of Anghiari (a discussion about this can be read on the Internet in the Tarot History Forum with contributions especially by Phaeded). If one were to accept such a proposal, one would conclude that the triumphs commissioned by Giusto Giusti were not only the first documented today but were in fact absolutely among the first to be made, only a few months after the battle. Thinking of the famous triptych by Paolo Uccello, kept in beautiful exhibition in the room of Lorenzo de' Medici, it would be natural to think rather of the Battle of San Romano of 1432.

One must also take account of an entirely different possibility, virtually to the contrary, that at first glance would seem absurd: the association of triumphal motifs not with a major victory, but even with a military defeat. In Florence the Zagonara defeat of 1424 indeed aroused a great impression, which put in jeopardy the independence of the city and forced the ruling classes to urgently find new forms of legitimacy. If we have no confirmation of actual triumphs, which immediately would appear at the least incongruous, we find, however, something comparable in the rapid growth of the city's festivities, reported by Paola Ventrone 12.
The same desire for self-promotion and legitimization, underlying the political and cultural context described above, also formed the underlying motivation for the establishment of new parties and for the restructuring of the patronal celebration of St. John. The appearance, or enhancement, of these festivals is placed, significantly, in the years around the defeat of Zagonara of 28 July 1424. In this crucial fight the Florentine army, led by the commanding general Carlo Malatesta, had been beaten by that of Philippo
12 P. Ventrone, Teatro civile e sacra rappresentazione a Firenze nel Rinascimento [Civil theatre and sacred representation in Florence in the Renaissance]. Florence 2016.

Maria Visconti, marking a major defeat for the foreign policy of the Albizzo faction, which had applied to the population significant economic efforts, making, as well, more urgent the need for the legitimazation of the ruling social class [faction?]. (P. 46.)
On the other hand, if the depiction of a military triumph is not tied to the contemporary or recent past, but instead corresponds to events of classical antiquity, as often occurs, it becomes difficult to distinguish this case from the following, for related reasons.

Latin roots

A second possibility is related to the search to enhance the Roman roots of the foundation of Florence. The immediate connection is Laudatio Florentinae Urbis, composed around 1403 by Leonardo Bruni, and other works, even more purely historical linked to it. It essentially gives value to the foundation of Florence by the "Roman Republic", at that time considered the most valid in the Roman world, when it was already firmly and validly constituted but before its values dissolved in the empire..

In the vision of Coluccio Salutati and the early humanists around him, these roots in Romanity then makes Florence appear as the most worthy heir of ancient Rome, similarly independent, since the city government could avoid too oppressive control by both the emperor that the pope. The study of the Latin classics was spreading more and more, and one could already speak of a humanism at the city level, although still at a preliminary stage. In short, the triumphs in the decorations bring to daily view, in the bedroom itself, episodes known from antiquity, capable of inciting to deeds of valor and merit to recognize the worthy citizens of Florence as the heirs of Rome.

Wedding processions

In the first case considered above, no connection with a marriage is seen; in the second case, one can only think to place suitable scenes that will remain subjects of the family's attention for decades, but which will continue to have little in common with their origin, dating back to a marriage; something more closely related would be helpful for us. Also for playing cards, it has often been pointed

out that a special deck of cards coincides with the celebration of a particular marriage. I have serious doubts about how extendive this custom could really have been (which would be ruled out for the production of ordinary playing cards), but if we switch from playing cards to wedding chests, a connection with marriage immediately becomes inescapable.

There can then be reported a circumstance that binds triumphal motifs to marriage ceremonies. The cassone was the main subject of the public procession that occurred between the bride’s house of origin and the family in which she was entering, and could therefore enhance the power and wealth of the families involved. Here is how the situation is described by Alessandra Malquoril 13.
The production of historiated wedding chests in fifteenth century Florence had as its primary purpose, in the city's social arrangement, of making visible and palpable the prestige of those who had commissioned them. When the cassoni paraded following the wedding procession in the streets of the city, aristocrats, powerful bourgeois and wealthy merchants made explicit to their fellow citizens the economic and political power that their family was able to exercise. This sumptuary production also allowed, with great "entrampement of the eye", to give space to the Florentine taste and that interest for the erudite themes raging at the time - because they were tied to the fortune of the classics that since the beginning of the century were gradually being discovered, copied and translated by the early humanists - or themes inspired by the poetry and prose of the time. (p. 79.)
In the literature it is found that the commissioning of cassoni was entrusted to the parents of either the bride or the groom. It seems that both cases have actually occurred, but with a kind of change in fashion rather limited in time (even just before the middle of the fifteenth century), with the commissioning passing from the father of the bride to that of the groom. This passage in commissining would also prompt a change in subject and style: now it was the groom, in person or through his family, to make his own tastes prevail, for heroism and battles with settings and spirit far more manly than before.

The traditional procession to the house of the groom had pecisely the character of a triumphal procession; so, this "triumph of marriage"
13 C. Paolini, D. Parenti, L. Sebregondi (eds.), Virtù d'amore: pittura nuziale nel Quattrocento fiorentino [Virtue of Love: Wedding painting in fifteenth century Florence]. Florence 2010.

even gave the title to an exhibition and the related catalogue 14. In the corresponding comment, it is stressed that this triumphal character of the procession had already been suggested by Witthöft, with particular reference to the groom and his family.
Much like Weisbach, Brucia Witthoft connects the revival of triumph imagery to Renaissance wedding processions. But in her view, the humanist-inspired triumph relates primarily to the groom. “The wedding procession is thus a ‘triumph’ in two senses. The groom’s triumph is that of a war-party, who succeeded in carrying off a bride and her possessions. The family’s triumph is the display of their wealth and power... the celebration of the alliance as a source of political or economic power.” (p. 10.)
It is also proposed to combine this motivation for the subjects of the decoration of cassoni with previous humanistic teaching. The same Witthöft 15 expresses this as follows.
If, as we have seen, wedding chests are supplied by the groom and are carried in his triumphal wedding procession, they might be expected to reflect his education and to express his view of the ceremony. This is indeed the case in choosing subjects from the Aeneid or from Roman military history and triumphs, the purchaser had clear sanction in humanist writings. The sudden appearance of classical subjects around 1430 can, in fact, be partly explained by these circumstances. For it is about that time that the first generation of men who were educated according to humanist precepts reached marriageable age. (p. 53.)

Marriage chests became classical in inspiration because they were chosen by men whose humanist education stressed ancient writings as moral guides. They often illustrated battles and triumphs because they were carried in a quasi-military triumphal wedding procession. (p. 54.)
It may be noted here that the date for the change of themes is brought forward [in English, we would say "moved back"] to 1430, but she speaks of classical motifs generally more than those of triumphs in particular.
14 C. L. Baskins, The triumph of marriage. Boston 2008.
15 B. Witthoft, Artibus et historiae, 3 (1982) 5, 43-59.

Wedding ceremonies

Again with reference to weddings, we can ask whether there are for the cassoni some hypotheses that can interpret the observation of a rather abrupt appearance of triumphal motifs in their decoration. Well, not only does such a situation exist, but it is precisely the same as that already met for birth trays. The observation of de Carli,repeated above, had in fact been advanced not only for birth trays but also, explicitly, for cassoni. It may be worth recalling the remarks at the basis of that interpretation.

Why do the triumphs appear? In the specific case of weddings, because the atmosphere has become more severe and the humanists privileged a Petrarchan vision in which love triumphs, but in turn must be overcome by more controlled attitudes that lead to praise not the immediate pleasure of the senses but rather moderation in men, modesty in women, seriousness in all. We are now fully in phase with the marriage ceremony; However, the atmosphere remains the same as already indicated for the second case: it is again the usual environment of the first humanists that dictates the trend. Ovid and Boccaccio go out of fashion, Petrarch becomes the new basis, and his Triumphs become increasingly important.

Various motivations are taken into consideration, which, however, at least in part lend themselves to be combined. In particular, it seems that the cultural background of the atmosphere begun by the early humanists is always more or less present. Eventually the problem would be to identify who is understood as early humanists and at what precise moment in history should the reference be made in particular, with a clearer definition of what we find in the specified literature.

7. Chronological order and playing cards

In the same book quoted above, Cristelle Baskins reports (p. 10) as the first examples of the introduction of triumphal motifs their appearance in the illuminated manuscripts of Il Trionfi and birth trays, and a little later in birth trays by lo Scheggia; Now, whether one accepts that designation of priority or not, we need also to enter the cassoni into the sequence. We saw that

there exist both interpretations that link the introduction of triumphal motifs in their decorations to weddings, and those that link them to other things more generally in the cultural environment.

It is quite evident that between the two types of interpretation there may exist a temporal dependence; if the triumphal motifs appeared in a dozen different Florentine products and the aim is to reconstruct the passage from one to another, it is clear that priority in innovation must be given to objects, or one object, in which the triumphal motifs also found a direct link, as indeed is traceable in the case under examination of cassoni.

Some possible interpretations have been discussed for the appearance in the cassone of those images, which we are interested to link to the news of a deck of the "naibi a trionfi” playing cards as a product documented in Florence already in 1440. We do not know when "triumphal" cards first could have entered into the deck, but we know that already the year 1440c comes too early for their appearance of the triumphs in birth trays, and also, as we have seen here, of wedding chests.

If the triumphs as playing cards were created already with the 22 "standard" superior cards that we know from subsequent tarot decks, we do not find a guide in the literature, or a corresponding series of images, in the artistic production of the time. But if we imagine that the first additions of triumphal cards, whatever their number, represent triumphs, classical or Petrarchan, then the atmosphere is the same as that of the first humanists, among whom such new ideas, or new interpretations of old ideas, were current at the time. It remains to be explained why the new trend appears first in playing cards, as was found in birth trays and now also we can confirm for cassoni.

8. Possible precursors

From what has been observed so far it would seem useful to bring forward [I think Franco means what in English would be called "move back"] the dates reported for the appearance of triumphal motifs in cassoni. It being understood that the extraordinary flowering of the theme came from the middle of the fifteenth century, is it possible to trace preceding examples? To answer, we must distinguish many different cases. One case is research that advances [moves back?] the dates by a few years, to the fifth decade

of the century. We can then consider a "gain" [loss?] of a couple of years for Scheggio and a little more for Apollonio di Giovanni (with the records in the books of his shop starting in 1446). Another opportunity is perhaps offered by cassoni decorated by Pesellino before 1450, even if they appear as independent of “standard” production and characterized by greater originality and superior quality.

The better possibility is encountered if we turn to the revisitations of classical motifs, not necessarily and not only of triumphal type. The obvious connection is with the first humanists, but when trying to trace the origin of humanism it will end with the return to the full fourteenth century, reaching personages the caliber of Boccaccio and especiallyPetrarch. Regarding I Trionfi, it has been reported several times and discussed by various historians that there was a considerable time lag between the literary tradition and the associated pictorial one.

It seems, however, possible to reduce the time lag indicated if we take a look at some cassoni, even fourteenth century ones, which can be connected with the literary activities of Coluccio Salutati and the circle of humanists who first gravitated around him. Early connections of this kind have been suggested in particular by Jerzy Miziolek 16.
All the illustrations are part of the official art commissioned for public buildings. In the present study we have shown that at the end of the fourteenth century also cassoni or forzieri, art objects created for the needs of private individuals, contained interesting subjects, both mythological and drawn from ancient history. These oldest historiated forzieri, so far little studied (or even published), usually dated after 1430, if not later, depicting stories from Livy, Ovid, Statius, Hyginus, Valerius Maximus or their medieval commentators and popularizers, first of all fourteenth century, today offer the opportunity to understand even better the taste for antiquity in Florence during the chancellorship of Salutati (1375-1406). We have examined twenty of these paintings that have come down to our times, but we can be virtually certain that the number was actually much larger. (P. 115.)
In the case of all the works discussed in this book we have in fact to do with the classical literature depicted, so we are confronted witha real example of the influence not only of the direct or indirect teaching of Salutati and his circle on works art created for private citizens but also in some
16 J. Miziolek, Soggetti classici sui cassoni fiorentini alla vigilia del rinascimento [Classical subjects on Florentine chests at the eve of the Renaissance]. Warszawa 1996.

way we have proof of the triumph of the taste for the ancient already in the eighties and nineties of the fourteenth century. So there is a certain parallelism between the literary lines of the humanists and the production of cassoni or forzieri thirty or forty years earlier than was previously thought. So fourteenth-century humanism is joined also by way of literature painted in forms still medieval. (P. 120.)
As already clearly stated in the title of the book, here we are no longer, as in other cases, in the early Renaissance; Here we have backed away until its ...eve. However it is not clear to what extent the early reminder of the classical tradition, here documented and discussed by Miziolek, could also involve "our" triumphs.

9. Conclusion

Art historians have devoted numerous studies to wedding chests of Renaissance Florentine production. Many of these studies have focused on the problems of reconstruction and attribution of the specimens, often preserved only in part. Of cassoni decorations, much information has been obtained, especially on clothing sumptuous and ordinary, public and private buildings, the typical habits of social and family life of the time. The point of our interest is very secondary, limited to the appearance of the triumphal motifs in their decoration. It is not easy to find the first examples of that trend that would have had widespread diffision only after the mid-fifteenth century.

Compared to other craft products in which decoration with triumphal motifs flourish, for cassoni the situation is different: in this case in fact the connection with weddings is certain and evident. There are then logical connections which would suggest that precisely in wedding chests the first triumphal motifs could appear, which would then also be transferred to various objects. For us, who are preferentially interested in the appearance of triumphs among the playing cards, the situation, however, presents itself, instead, in a hardly understandable manner, as reversed: according to what we know today about the spread of these Florentine styles the triumphs seem to have entered the playing cards before and not after.

Franco Pratesi – 31.08.2016.

Re: Pratesi on birth trays and now cassoni

I want to make some comments on Franco's note.

His conclusion can be put succinctly: "...according to what we know today about the spread of these Florentine styles, the triumphs seem to have entered the playing cards before and not after", meaning, before and not after they entered the cassoni.

But is this true? If you want to know the answer to that question, it seems to me, you have to look at cassoni that were made before the time when the triumphs entered the playing cards. And if the number of such specimens is insufficient, then we can conclude nothing, but ask the same questions about other cultural products such as illuminated manuscripts and literary products, i.e. manuscripts of old works, whether illuminated or not, and new literary and didactic writings.

In all these cases, there is the obvious difficulty that many, apart from new literary works, will be undated and unsigned. Another difficulty no one knows when triumphs entered the playing cards. However it was some time at or before 1440. At least we know that the special cards added to playing cards were called "trionfi" at or before that date. If triumphal scenes entered cassoni only after that date, we may say with some confidence that triumphs entered playing cards before they entered cassoni.

So we need to look for triumphal themes in cassoni before 1440. Here we will obviously not be concerned with Apollonio di Giovanni, Marco il Buono, lo Scheggia, or Pesselino, because their careers started after 1440, but rather with cassoni makers before them. They may even be, to us, nameless.

One such, not nameless, is Giovanni di Marco, called dal Ponte (1385-1437/8). Apparently his shop was by a bridge. On the Internet a cassone of interest comes up, identified as his by Christie's auction house.

On one side it has the seven virtues, personified by ladies, and, it would seem (although the panels have long been separated) the seven liberal arts on the other. At least some of the seven virtues are certainly on the tarot cards that appeared after 1440. The Cary-Yale, from Milan, has all three theological virtues and one cardinal virtue. The Charles VI and Rothschild Sheet have all three cardinal virtues but no theological virtues. However in the Florentine variant of the tarot called Minchiate, all seven virtues were present. Dal Ponte's depictions of the virtues, moreover, matches that of the Charles VI in giving the ladies the octagonal halos that the Charles VI gives to its virtues. The attributes of the virtues are not the same in the two cases, but some are similar. Dal Ponte's Fortitude has a lion skin, whereas the Charles VI has a broken pillar.

Do the seven virtues count as "triumphal subjects"? I don't see why not. If by "triumphal subjects" is meant "subjects such as those on the triumphal cards", then of course they were. If by "triumphal subjects" is meant "subjects that triumph" (assuming that all the tarot subjects were interpreted allegorically in that way), they were typically represented, in medieval times, as trampling on exemplars of corresponding vices. Also, virtue was not only part of the old learning of the Middle Ages, but of the new learning promoted by Leonardo Bruni et al.

This one panel makes quite a jump in the number of tarot subjects seen in cassoni before 1440: from 0 to 7, or 3 if you insist that a proto-Minchiate did not exist before 1440 and that the Cary-Yale is one of a kind (neither assumption seems well grounded to me). We don't actually know if the 3 cardinals were part of the tarot before 1440. On the 5x14 theory, Fortitude and Temperance wouldn't have been part of the PMB. In other decks, Fortitude or Temperance is the only surviving virtue (Cary-Yale and Catania respectively). Surely at least one of the three was part of the pre-1441 tarot, most likely all three. And to me the fact that the virtues appear in a variety of places in the different early orders suggests to me that they are from a period when tarot interactions between different geographic centers were not plentiful, and so of an early period marked by war and threat of war rather than peace.

There is another cassone panel that Callman tentatively attributed to dal Ponte and given to "the 1420s or 1430s" by (Apollonio di Giovanni p. 12). However others give it and another, almost identical, to some other painter at the beginning of the century. Here is a useful summary of the literature by Miziolek (note 89 of "Cassoni istoriati with 'Torello and Saladin': Observations on the Origins of a New Genre of Trecento Art in Florence", Studies in the History of Art, Vol. 61, Symposium Papers XXXVIII: Italian Panel Painting of the Duecento and Trecento (2002), pp. 442-469)"
Among the earliest cassoni istoriati are two almost identical representations of The Triumph of Fame (the whereabouts of both are unknown). One of them is reproduced in Mina Gregori, "Biennale Internazionale dell'Antiquariato, Firenze: Dipinti e sculture," Arte illustrata 2 (1969), 110, the other in Dorothy C. Shorr, "Some Notes on the Iconography of Petrarch's Triumph of Fame," Art Bulletin 20 (1938), 100-107. See also Rosa Prieto Gilday, "Politics as Usual. Depictions of Petrarch's Triumph of Fame in Early Renaissance Florence" (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, 1996), cat. 6, fig. 4, with wrong dating. There is an early chest (c. 1390), presently housed in the Bargello, depicting The Expedition of the Argonauts, reproduced in Schiaparelli 1983, 2:pl. 156a. All three are ascribed by Boskovits and Fahy to the Master of Charles III (or Ladislas) Durazzo. It appears that none of them is by him but rather by another Florentine anonymous painter active at the turn of the fourteenth century; see Jerzy Miziolek, "The Origins of Cassone Painting in Florence," in Center 19. Record of Activities and Research Reports, June 1998-May 1999, National Gallery of Art, Center for Advanced Study in the Visual Arts (Washington, 1999), 100-104.
Shorr, the earliest, gave it to c. 1400, the same as Miziolek.He ignores Callmann's attribution and dating. I have not yet managed to obtain Miziolek's essay last cited.

This is a theme that had existed in illuminated manuscripts even in c. 1380 (of "On Illustrated Men" by Petrarch, ... ch-triumph), based on a lost "Gloria" fresco by Giotto, 1335 Milan (see e.g. ... ilano.html), obviously not based on Petrarch. One difference in the cassone version is that Fame, instead of being in a bubble above the famous personages below, is now in their midst. For the moment I give only that detail, the figure of Fame (reproduced from Callmann, Plate 25):

I cannot tell what Fame has in her hands. A ball and scepter would make her similar to the Charles VI "World" card, but I don't think that's it. However the depiction bears a close resemblance to the Florentine Chariot card.Compare the Catania, particularly the suggestions of the two grooms by their legs on the card.

The Catania is of particular interest because two of its cards have exposed recycled paper with the dates "1427" and "1428" on them, as reported in a recent Playing Card article (described at viewtopic.php?f=11&t=1112#p17317). So it may then also be of "the 1420s or 1430s", as Callmann characterized the cassone.

Here is the cassone panel as a whole.

We can see here another difference (besides Fame's being in the midst of the people) between this image and the 1380 illustration of Petrarch's "On Illustrated Men" is that now they are not all male or all armed warriors.Among the famous personages surrounding Fame, I see a few, immediately to Fame's right, who seem of high status, exhorting with breasts bared rather than fighting themselves.

Compare to the faces on the Emperor card ( ... mperor.jpg) and King of Batons ( ... 000756.jpg) in the Rothschild cards. Many in the cassoni are female, some with crowns, suggesting the Empress. Others, generally older looking, have conical crowns with suggestions of bifurcations on its surface. They might be Popes. So we might have three more cards here, for a possible total now of 11. With the cassone and birth-tray scenes of people submitting to Love, that makes 12. If the World card in the tarot counts as another experession of Fame/Gloria, that would be 13, but I won't count it, hoping to avoid controversy on what is here a small point. If not minchiate but tarocchi, it would be 10, with a case for Prudence as World as well as Fame.

Some tarot subjects known to be of the early tarot in more than one city are conspicuously missing. I have in mind Death, Time, the Wheel of Fortune, and the Angel of Judgment. (Needless to say, they would bring the total to 16, the same number as speculated in another thread, viewtopic.php?f=11&t=1086) These four triumphs are all Petrarchan themes, except for the Wheel, which was one of Boccaccio's triumphs in Amarosa Visione and was justly celebrated in many allegorical works before and since. On the one hand, they are all rather gloomy subjects, perhaps not suitable in isolation for a wedding procession. On the other hand, the Petrarchan triumphs as a whole were in fact used on wedding cassoni at some point after 1440.

Here we have to ask, when did Petrarch's poem become popular in Florence? It was not one of those singled out by Salutati, who preferred Africa, about the Punic Wars (I checked this once, but do not remember my source). A study of the frequency, by year or decade, of manuscript copies produced of Petrarch's poem in Florence would be of use. I have done a partial survey, but not including those manuscripts currently held in Italy, of which lists have eluded me. My preliminary study suggests that the poem did not become popular as a subject for manuscript illuminations in Florence until after 1440. Indeed there was the famous letter of Matteo di Pasti, miniaturist,to Piero de' Medici in Sept. 1441, describing illuminations he was working on for Piero. (This letter has been extensively discussed on THF. As far as I can tell, no one is sure if these illuminations are extant. The earliest extant illuminations of all six Triumphs are by Apollonio di Giovanni in 1442.) A similar but smaller burst in number of I Trionfi manuscripts happened in France around 1500. These bursts in demand most likely indicate that the tarot images inspired the demand for illuminated manuscripts, which in turn, in Florence, inspired their inclusion in the cassoni, by the same workshops, of those people's wedding processions.

Dal Ponte and his workshop as the possible producer of cassoni is of interest for another reason. He has been suggested as card-maker, notably by Luciano Bellosi in 1985 ("A drawing by Giovanni del Ponte and some tarot cards". Art Bulletin, 1985, 30, pp. 27-35, in Italian in ), reiterated and expanded by Christina Fiorini in 2011 ("I tarocchi della Collezione Rothschild al Louvre: nuove proposte di lettura", The Playing-Card 35:1 (Sept. 2006), pp. 52-63), specifically in relation to the Rothschild cards. These may or may not be from a tarot deck, since the only tarot subject is an Emperor, and there was a special deck at that time called "Emperors"). He painted other triumphal scenes, most famously a "St. George and the Dragon" which Bellosi compared to the Rothschild Knight of Staves. For more on this see my blog-essay at

My conclusion is that if you want to see what some of the tarot subjects might have looked like in Florence of the 1430s, look at certain cassoni judged of that time or earlier. Determining whether these tarot images were inspired by the cassoni or vice versa seems to me hard to say. We don't really know whether the cassoni or the Catania (and of course decks now lost) is earlier. And even if the cassoni images are earlier, that would not mean that the cassoni inspired the tarot, because there is much left unaccounted for: the selection of some subjects but not others (i.e. not the Liberal Arts, not various other virtues, not vices), their order, and four missing subjects (at least), probably inspired by Petrarch's poem, For now I only observe their similarities, and how they fit the Roman-inspired heroic culture cultivated by Salutati, Bruno, et al. I am grateful to Franco for bringing the latter aspect to our attention, and also for helping us to see "the cassoni in the triumphs", i.e. seeing the cassone as objects on triumphal themes in an explicitly triumphal procession, that of the married pair's journey to the groom's home.

Re: Pratesi on birth trays and now cassoni

I have now accessed another article by Jerzy Miziolek on cassoni, "The Origins of Cassone Painting in Florence", 1999. It is actually available to anyone at ... ter-19.pdf, pp. 100-104. While much of it is repetition of what he had said in his previous work, there is one paragraph that contains new material, with old material of possible interest, on pp. 103-104.
A cassone with the Expedition of the Argonauts (c. i39o, Museo del Bargello, Florence) is undoubtedly one of the earliest chests adorned with a unified narrative over its entire front. The main literary source of the panel appears to be an Italian version of Guido delle Colonne's Historia destructionis Troiae. A copy of this book (Biblioteca Laurenziana), illustrated in Florence in 1356, provides comparative material for most scenes shown on the cassone. I was only recently able to recognize the companion piece for the Bargello chest in a heavily repainted panel in the Stibbert Museum, Florence. While numerous early cassone panels are close in style to frescoes by Agnolo Gaddi and Nicolo di Pietro Gerini, the two Argonauts panels show similarities with some works of the Cione brothers and their followers. The same can be said about two almost identical panels in private collections depicting the [start of 104] Triumph of Fame as described by Boccaccio in Amorosa visione (6:75). Their lost pendants may have represented the Triumph of Genius or the Triumph of Love, more suitable subjects for marriage chests. Because there are nearly identical representations of specific themes (the Triumph of Fame, the Story of Torello and Saladin, and the Story of Lucretia) appearing on these early cassoni, it seems likely that the cassoni were stock items in workshops active at the end of the fourteenth century.
It could be argued that the theme of the Argonauts, a group of heroes on a quest, could be considered a triumphal subject. The story of Torello and Saladin shows the triumph of both friendship (Torello and Saladin) and married love over separation and presumed death (Torello and his wife). Lucretia is a triumph of chastity over its violation.

For the last two mentioned, the admittedly speculative themes mentioned are overtly triumphal. It might be wondered, what is the difference between a Triumph of Fame based on Boccaccio and a Triumph of Fame based on Petrarch? I read somewhere that Boccaccio referred to famous women as well as men, whereas Petrarch did not. However when I look at Petrarch's poem ( ... e=IV-II.en), I see precisely nine women mentioned, several of which, such as Hippolyta, Cleopatra, and Judith, might warrant a triumph of their own. I do not know how many there are in Boccaccio. I do not find an English translation online. I will have to go to the library again.

Re: Pratesi on birth trays and now cassoni

Here is Boccaccio, Amorosa Visione (1342), trans. Robert Hollander (Hanover NH: New England Press, 1986). Canto VI. Fame is on a triumphal chariot, decorated all around with laurel fronds. She holds an upright sword in one hand and a golden apple in the other. There are four white horses. She is surrounded by a circle in which the whole world seems to be included. That part is probably worth quoting, for its relationship to the Florentine "World" card (VI.64-75).
Et entro l'altre cose ch'ivi scorte
allora furon da me 'ntorno a questa
eccelsa donnam, nimica di morte
nel magnanimo petto, fu ch'a sesta
un cerchio si moveva alto e ritondo,
da' pie passando a lei sovra la testa.
Ne credo che sia cosa in tutto 'I mondo,
villa, paese, dimestico o strano,
che non paresse dentro di quel tondo.
Era sovra costei, in areo piano,
un verso scritto che dicea leggendo:
"Io son la Gloria del popol mondano".

(And among other things which I noticed there
around about this supreme
lady in her magnanimous breast
the enemy of death, was a perfect circle
rotating lofty and round,
from beneath her feet and over her head.
I do not believe there can be anything
in the whole world, town or country, domestic or foreign,
which would not appear in that circle.
Over the lady, in pure gold, there was
a verse which said when one read it:
"I am the Glory of the worldly folk.")
The idea is that the whole world is actually in that circle, at least in appearance. Naturally someone trying to paint the image realistically would have some difficulty, because if he painted the world, we wouldn't see her. The tarot painters would solve that problem by having her hold a circle divided into three parts, for Europe, Asia, and Africa, or with her standing on a circle with hills and buildings in it.

Canto VII starts, or maybe continues, the list of famous personages, mythical and otherwise. Most are men, but Ninus is with his wife, who succeeded him valorously on the throne. Later there are two ladies, Tamiris (queen of the Masagetae) and Niobe, after which many more men. Canto VIII: after a page and a half of men, we have Helen of Troy. Then with Orestes, being menaced by him, is Clytemnestra his mother. Then Penthesilea, queen of the Amazons, and unnamed female companions. Then the daughter of King Latinus (Lavinia, future wife of Aeneas) and Deianira grieving for Hercules. Canto IX: Dido, grieving Aeneas. Then Hecuba, nearly lifeless, with her daughter Polyxena. Then comes Hercules' mother, followed by Hypsipyle, Medea, Camilla, Ilia (mother of Romulus and Remus, whom she carries). Then a slew of men, with Cloelia, Roman maiden who courageously escaped from captivity. Canto X: Cleopatra with Mark Antony. And Cornelia, consort of Pompey. Then Julia with Trajan, and Calpurnia with Caesar. Canto XI; Guinevere with Arthur, Isolde with Tristan. And more men.

So: the chariot is clearly delineated. The women are mostly ones paired with men, even those that are listed separately, with other women. Many but not all are grieving.

Now, for comparison, Petrarch, ... ge=IV-I.en, whose Triumph of Fame came after Boccaccio's (written c. 1450-1460 (?), circulated in limited copies until some time after his death in 1374). First, Fame herself (the Italian is on the web-page)
I saw appearing on the other side
Her who saves man from the tomb, and gives him life.
As at the break of day an amorous star
Comes from the east before the rising sun,
Who gladly enters her companionship,
Thus came she. From what rhetoricians' school
Shall come the master who could fully tell
What I shall only tell in simple words?
The sky all round about was now so bright
My eyes were vanquished by its brilliancy,
In spite of the desire that filled my heart.
And that's all. No chariot, no description of her attributes. The people with her are
Folk armed alike with valor and with steel,
As in the triumphs that in olden times
Proceeded through the sacred ways of Rome.
But that's the only reference to the triumphal parades of yesteryear. Most of those named, of course, are men. But there is one section for women:
A troop of warrior women now I saw:
Antiope and Orithia, armed and fair;
Hippolyta, mourning for her lifeless son,
And Menalippe, each of them so swift
That Hercules could hardly vanquish them?
And one he kept, the other gave to Theseus;
The widow who, unweeping, saw her son
In death, and then for him such vengeance took
That she slew Cyrus, and now slays his fame:
For even now, hearing his dreadful end,
He seems again to be dying in his guilt,
So much of honor did he lose that day!
Then I saw her who in an evil hour
Saw Troy; and with them too the Latin maid
Who fought the Trojan band in Italy.
And then I saw the queen, high-spirited,
Who with her hair half kempt and half unkempt
Sped to 0' ercome revolt in Babylon,
And Cleopatra, both of them aflame
With wrongful love; and in the line I saw
Zenobia, more jealous of her honor:
For she was fair, and in the flower of youth,
And all the more in beauty and in youth
To cherish honor is to merit praise;
And in her woman's heart was strength so great
That with her beauty and her armored locks
She brought dismay to men unused to fear?
I speak of the imperial might of Rome
That she assailed in war-albeit at last
She for our triumph was a wealthy prize.
Among the names that I must disregard
Shall not be that of Judith, widow brave,
Who reft her foolish lover of his head.
And that's all, about 10 women, not presented as grieving or bearing famous sons, but as defending honor, theirs or their country's. It's a different tenor, a more select group.

So which description, if either, was used for the "dal Ponte" cassone? (I use quotes because if it was done c. 1400 it was too early to be him.) There is a detail noticed by Shorr ("Some Notes on the Iconography of Petrarch's Triumph of Fame," Art Bulletin, Vol. 20, No. 1 (Mar., 1938), pp. 100-107): the presence, second figure from the top left, of a lady holding two babies. Above her the letters "RHEA" say who she is, Rea Silvia, mother of Romulus and Remus, mentioned by Boccaccio but not by Petrarch. Apparently the word "Romulus" is also there. Another distinguishing feature, it seems to me, is that the throng does not seem to include philosophers, who wouldn't normally be shown on horseback anyway. Petrarch included philosophers but Boccaccio put them with the first of his triumphs, Wisdom. As in Boccaccio, some women are paired with men and some aren't.

For comparison, here is one view of lo Scheggia's cassone version (for more views of it, see viewtopic.php?f=11&t=858&start=60)

It seems rather similar to the "Dal Ponte", in that women are included, not necessarily paired with men. But there are also what look like philosophers. On other cassoni by other artists later there are many more of this type (e.g. Pesselino, ). That comes from Petrarch.

Unlike the "Dal Ponte", lo Scheggia's Fame's car is pulled by elephants, a traditional association with triumphs in Rome, perhaps from Scipio's conquest of Carthage, seen also in Italy on Roman-era sarcophagi with triumphal processions.

Petrarch, of course, mentions no chariot, no horses (and no elephants), and nothing in either of Fame's hands. We cannot say for sure that all those things were due to Boccaccio, but it is likely. Such attributes were part of Fame's depiction in illuminated manuscripts that Shorr describes and shows. Shorr dates one to 1379, another "toward the end of the century."

1379: ... detail.jpg

toward end of 14th cent.: ... detail.jpg

In the illuminations, a winged Gloria Mundi is seated in a chariot pulled by horses on which are two grooms blowing trumpets, all of which are above the riders who look at her. In the later of the two there is a kind of mandala-shape surrounding the chariot.

The manuscripts are of Petrarch's De Viris Illustribus, but there is no allegory of Fame in that text. According to Shorr they are presumed to be based on a lost fresco in a series illustrating De Viris Illustribus in the Carrara Palace in Padua. The entry on Wikimedia Commons says the basis for the illuminations is a fresco in Milan by Giotto, a "Vanagloria" or "gloria mondana", i.e. worldly glory. This idea is argued by Creighton Gilbert, "The Lost Fresco by Giotto in Milan", Arte Lombarda 47/48 (1977), pp. 31-72). Gilbert proposed that Boccaccio was in fact inspired by the fresco, which would have been done in 1335, as also the Padua fresco and manuscripts were inspired. Shorr says that before Bocaccio there was Dante's depiction, Purgatorio XXIX, of Beatrice, or perhaps the Church, in a carro trionfale. with the 7 virtues, the apostles, the 4 beasts, the elders, and others, which Boccaccio knew well.

c. 1400: ... a-1400.jpg

Of around 1400 is another illumination (above) presumed related to the fresco series but also more in conformity to Boccaccio, in an illuminaiion now in Darmstadt but executed in Padua. Shorr says all three are related to Boccaccio's Amorosa Visione, but the third is closer than the others, in that she has no wings, she holds a sword, and she is surrounded by a true circle. She also holds in her other hand a small figure who appears also in the 1440s and after in Florence; Shorr says it is a red Cupid. She does not give a literary source for that detal, but it corresponds in color to one of three fountain-nymphs in a garden which the poet's persona enters toward the end of Amorosa Visione. Although all are made of marble, one black, the second "like fire", and the other "not overly white" (XXXVIII.79-88). Black is probably "love for profit", red is "sexual love", and white "honest love", according to the notes in the 1986 translation. Each statue spurts water in a different way: the black one as tears, the red one as spurts from a breast (as if from the heart, the notes say) and the white one upwards, in the direction of heaven.

Addition: According to Lutz S. Malke, "Contributo alle figurazione dei Trionfi e del Canzioni del Petrarca", in Commentari: revista di critica e storia del'arte, 1977, p. 245, the Cupid derives from line 53 of Canto VIII of Amorosa Visione, where Boccaccio says of a couple of heroes, that they were "di toccar quella donna disiosi", "desirous of touching the lady", i.e. Fama. "Disiosi" = "cupidi", as in a line by Leon Batista Alberti later saying of the life desirous of gloria, "quegli altri uomini cupidi di gloria".

As you can see, the iconography of the triumph of fame is rather complex in its history and sources.

In any case, it is Boccaccio's image of Fame, modified in various ways by a fresco and illuminated manuscript tradition, that persists in the "Dal Ponte" and later, not Petrarch's, even when the triumph illustrated is one of Petrarch's six. And when "Dal Ponte" shows the two grooms of earlier depictions standing next to rather than sitting on the horses, they are also added that way, sometimes, to the tarot Chariot card (the Catania); others continue to have them mounted, as in the Issy.

Then in the Rothschild sheet, the ball of the world returns as the circle divided into three (Asia, Europe, Africa), with the sword in the other hand: ... rocomp.jpg). That is on the Chariot card. The two attributes of the ball and the sword, with the circle of the world underneath, of course also appear in the type A World card.

Even the octagonal halo, not part of Boccaccio's description but on all of Dal Ponte's 7 virtues, is seen on at least one post-1450 version of the Triumph of Fame, that of Pesellino ( ... ernity.JPG), as well, of course, as on the Charles VI World card.

As for the series 6 Petrarchan triumphs on cassoni, as opposed to one or other of them (Fame, Chastity, Love), there is still no indication until 1440, when the game of triumphs already seems to have been firmly established in Florence.

Note: on Oct. 20 I added a paragraph citing Malke's view on what the little red cupid derives from in the Petrarch Trionfi illustrations: not from something the end of [i[Amorosa Visione[/i], but right there in his account of the Triumph of Fame. But it is fairly obscure.

Re: Pratesi on birth trays and now cassoni

mikeh wrote: This one panel makes quite a jump in the number of tarot subjects seen in cassoni before 1440: from 0 to 7, or 3 if you insist that a proto-Minchiate did not exist before 1440 and that the Cary-Yale is one of a kind (neither assumption seems well grounded to me). We don't actually know if the 3 cardinals were part of the tarot before 1440.
Hey Mike,
Aside from a featured single Virtue, there is no reason to limit yourself to cassoni when the 7 Virtues were ubiquitous in Florence, even overlooking the Piazza della Signoria on the 'Loggia dei Lanzi' (you have somehow intimately linked cassoni production to tarot production, which was not necessarily the case).

The seven virtues are consistently portrayed as a series, although a rare exception to the rule is the Theologicals as an isolated group on the tomb of the Anti-Pope in the baptistry (not an innovation - Theologicals were already linked as especially Papal) and even on the 'Loggia dei Lanzi', the three Theologicals are on a separate wall, not facing the Piazza but the Palazzo Vecchio. Given that tarot is more than likely not Papal, the default assumption is that all seven Virtues should appear in any non-Papal/civil medium - and that is indeed the case in the CY, with the working hypothesis that the 'World' is Prudence (and I further extrapolate that Giusti's 'Anghiari' deck commissioned only some 13 months earlier featured the same trumps).

The innovation would be to remove or replace the Theologicals, after the CY (which I argue was standard in terms of the trumps up to that date), as our expectation would be to see ALL of the virtues.
Given that the Theologicals continued to be pronounced on Papal tombs and thus especially 'papal', the rationale for the removal or replacement (I of course favor the later, since the Theologicals would still be indicated, in however an arcane way via antitypes or cognates), would be a tarot commissioned by someone carefully crafting his own relationship to the Papacy. On a related note, given the complete absence (discarding) of 'the Devil' from hand-painted decks we can safely assume the relationship of any pictorial media gave due consideration to Church approval (indeed, Pratesi's laws regarding card-playing often refer to distances to churches, etc.).

There is no evidence for proto-Minchiate before 1440 and there is no reason to assume the trumps of the CY were not standard until the c. 1450 PMB, which in turn became the new standard (there isn't a scrap of evidence - pictorial or textual - for 22 trumps pre-1450).

There was never a reason for papal-leaning Florence to ditch the Theologicals. So what if the impetus came from outside Florence, from a penultimate ally whose military means had and would protect Medici-controlled Florence?

I've touched on this elsewhere in your other Pratesi 'tarot origins' thread, but Cosimo allows liberal laws in regard to tarot in the very year Sforza takes Milan and begins his own tarot-making, in 1450 (and keep in mind Florence had city celebrations in honor of Sforza taking Milan). Sforza was at war with the previous pope (Eugene VI) and thus had good reason to go out of his way to curry favor with the new pope. The PMB does this in a variety of ways - the new pope was especially interested in regulating the Franciscans and 'Faith" is indeed transformed into a nun in Franciscan habit; 'Death' does not feature the slaughtered clergy but instead shows a simple skeleton with bow and arrow; etc. (I’ve addressed this in detail elsewhere). At all events the Milanese deck does not presume to represent the papal Theological virtues outright as part of its own identity (i.e., respect to a neutral papacy that has not sided with Milan). Also note this new pope, whom Filelfo personally knew and petitioned in person on behalf of Sforza, helped broker the peace with Venice four years after Sforza took Milan.

Back to Florence - my hypothesis is that a Milanese innovation, the replacement of the Theologicals, was received and adopted by allied Florence, as witnessed in the later CVI. But again, why would Florence have ever removed the Theologicals before 1450 when she did not do the same in any of her other personal/civil commissions featuring the Virtues? The Ferrarese 70 card deck of 1457 is easily explained as a holdover of the original 14 trump deck, as Ferrara was not an ally during the war; but afterwards, with Florentine and Milanese mass production of tarot, the new 22 trump deck became standard and supplanted the old.


The seven virtues below the parapet of the Loggia dei Lanzi, c. 1380:

Re: Pratesi on birth trays and now cassoni

Loggia de Lanzi ...


Charity and other virtues at ...

Added later:

Interesting detail, all other virtues (beside Charity) have wings and another frame.
Charity has the flame, which it also has in Minchiate ...


Francesco Pesellino has Caritas also similar and in central position.

Caritas (Nr. 19) was highest trump in Minchiate.

I remember to have read a discussion, that Caritas had a high role in Florence ... presenting the city pride on their better social system.
But Piero di Medici, who followed Cosimo, got a sudden fear about the finances of the Medici and demanded money back. This new interest caused many fears and the political crisis of 1466, followed by a short war.

In the Chess Tarot theories (assuming that the Charles IV had 16 trumps and we know them all) one can observe, that Sun+Moon and likely the Fool replaced the 3 theological virtues (which the 16-cards-reconstruction of Cary-Yale had before). I think, that this was the state in 1463.
A short time later Cosimo died and parallel to this the Medici chapel with 3 holy kings was ready. It seems, that then Sun-Moon-Star replaced the 3 theological virtues. The star could have been (naturally) connected to the 3 Holy Kings, Sun+Moon might have been also associated to the 3 kings (cause one was black, associating "night" and "Moon").
Minchiate (first mentioned in 1466) might have been produced in this time, the appearance of the Magician-Fool in two calendar pictures is dated to 1464/65.
Around 1470 Florentines behaved rather crazy about the 3 holy mages.

... :-) ... but I remember, that you have other theories about the Charles IV.

Re: Pratesi on birth trays and now cassoni

I'm glad to hear about all those 7 virtues in Florence, Phaeded. I had never noticed.

Huck: it seems a long shot to me to assume that the Charles VI had only 16 trumps. Given the newly found Catania Empress (made with paper originally printed 1427), a Catania Emperor very similar to the Charles VI Emperor, the Cary-Yale and PMB Empresses, and the game of "VIII Emperors" which might reasonably have had 4 Empresses, it seems a good bet that the Charles VI had an Empress, too. So there were probably at least 17, including the Fool. And it depends on when it was. 1463 seems to me pretty late for less than 22.

Didn't we discuss the magi before? I would have thought not only black, but red and white, at least in dress, at least in some paintings. If so, that would be moon, sun, and star.

Re: Pratesi on birth trays and now cassoni

Huck: it seems a long shot to me to assume that the Charles VI had only 16 trumps. Given the newly found Catania Empress (made with paper originally printed 1427), a Catania Emperor very similar to the Charles VI Emperor, the Cary-Yale and PMB Empresses, and the game of "VIII Emperors" which might reasonably have had 4 Empresses, it seems a good bet that the Charles VI had an Empress, too. So there were probably at least 17, including the Fool. And it depends on when it was. 1463 seems to me pretty late for less than 22.

Didn't we discuss the magi before? I would have thought not only black, but red and white, at least in dress, at least in some paintings. If so, that would be moon, sun, and star.
Even if we assume, that there is a very direct connection (same deck) between the deck fragments in the Castello Ursini and in Palermo, we don't have necessarily a direct connection (different decks, but the same motifs) between Alessandro Sforza deck type and Charles IV deck type. It's clear at least with some motifs, that there is a rather different style, and no guarantee, that possibly some motifs were totally exchanged.

The same is possible with other decks. If we take Michelino deck, Charles IV and Cary-Yale reconstruction as prototypes of decks with 16 trumps, we clearly see motif exchanges between them.
Also: If we see some motifs of PMB and a selection of cards of the Sforza deck type, which I give to 1512 (with Isabella d'Este motto), then one could have the impression, that they're more or less identical, but if specific strange cards (Fortezza, the viper heraldry card, Death) are included, we clearly see strong differences.

So your argument is not valid. What would you say, if once a market existed for customers, which were interested to buy single handpainted trump cards, not complete decks?
Already for 1440 we know, that Florentine artists produced a deck with Malatesta heraldic, likely by exchanging just a few cards. The price differences between Ferrara Trionfi cards and Florentine standard Trionfi decks is rather high, likely it was not a big question, that one would find artists willing to fulfill the expensive wish for individual Trionfi decks. That was just a matter of the price. And it is just a matter of logic, that just these expensive cards had good chances to stay available as items for collectors.

We have since recently the 1477 Bolognese document, which Franco interpreted as a sign, that the price relation between "decks with trumps" and "decks without trumps" was 5/4 ... just confirming the 5x14-theory (although it also might refer 5x16 or 5x15 or 5x13 or 5x12 or any other deck with 5 suits and an identical number of cards in the suits).
Actually a good object for a translation:

1477: Bologna – Aritmetica per carte e trionfi
Franco Pratesi – 09.06.2014

Re: Pratesi on birth trays and now cassoni

mikeh wrote:I'm glad to hear about all those 7 virtues in Florence, Phaeded. I had never noticed.
No need to be facetious and, again, I was not pointing out the obvious but asking a more perplexing question about the obvious:
why would Florence have ever removed the Theologicals before 1450 when she did not do the same in any of her other personal/civil commissions featuring the Virtues?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests